Thoughts on Defense Cap worlds?

[Infernape]

1-39, will never be polled tho

[CR3W]

I would love to have 1-4 def.  I wouldnt mind having a cap that is under 39 def.  Something is better than nothing.  

[موني]

1-39 considering most of the ppl currently clanning are 30+

[oops i killed u again]

@@Kim make work of this. I mean talk with slushpuppy and let slushpuppy actually bring the harmony back to sharkbrew, instead of being on a party with sharkbrew money. And then if sharkbrew does a attempt then we can see further.

 

ps: 1-20 def is best, since mithril sucks( 1 bang). If 1-30/39 then all will mass train that def. I just like to see every1 returning alot and getting banged for so many sets.

[Zee]

1-13.

[Braden]

As much as it'd be cool to see and knowing it'd never happen, i still had to vote 1-39 defence only because I'm too lazy/don't play enough to train a completely new account.

 

Realistically, if it were to happen; 1-20 defence. 

[holydreams]

1-20

[Asuna]

normally I'd say 1-20 but since most of the community got 30+ it would be a waste.. I mean as if we all make new accounts xD 1-39

[Old Nox]

1-4 or 1-39. There is no point of mith pures. 

[Kaz]

1-20 forreal! That would be sick af. Could even do a world for just 1 def maybe too for the purposes of the people who stay true to being a REAL PURE. #1def4life

[Ascent Public Relations]

1-20

[Mg F T W]

It should either be 1-25 def or 1-29 def. The reason behind these numbers concerns room for error (e.g. some person receives def xp because they had defence mode on). 

 

As for the first option, it allows room for those p2p robes. The second option allows room for further defence xp mistakes to occur but limits the model of the pure on a mithril scheme rather than that of addy. 

 

However, the ideal should be that pures are aiming to have 20 (f2p) or 25 (p2p) defence. The reason for the 25 or 29 def cap is to allow for space for error. 

 

One may be inclined to have a 30 def cap, but reasons for this most likely stem from being accustomed to how things currently are. Rather, one should be concerned with how things ought to be. Placing the cap at 25 or 29 def will restore warring and clanning dynamics to the way things were. In addition, the relevant difference between a 1 defence pure vs. a 20 defence pure is much more closer and relevant compared to a 1 defence pure vs. a 30 defence pure.

[zetro]

would be nice 1-4 def but 1-20 def is iight to

[Ir0ny]

1-20 and 1-39 would be nice

[slushpuppy]

No thanks, need rune armor loot from failed lvl 50 CD mains

[Peace seeker]

20 def big dik

[Saucey]

1-20, 30 def isn't a pure lmfao.

[Brandon]

I personally enjoy our 1-99 def worlds

[Mi Ni]

1-20 like it used to be when pure clanning actually worked. Nowdays fearless prefer 40+def nayways on lpc scene l0l

[Munqki]

Not willing to do another pure so 1-39 XD

[ibro]

I would prefer 1-25def world as there will be people that either goof on shared/def exp or already have preexisting 25def that I am perfectly okay with. 

 

 

Honestly I am torn on the decision. Clan leaderships have clearly shown they are incapable of regulating themselves in regards to non-pure accounts. At the same time, the pvp community doesn't need to be fragmented further than it already has been - not to mention the uproar caused by the mass majority of non-pvp players. 

 

The blame lies on the leaderships of pure clans. I'm for it, wish it hadn't come to waste product like this, hope it's possible. 

 

@@Kim

i have 26 pls no :c

[DULL]

yes yes more useless topics keep them coming

[Jimi]

tbh every1 should go main  

[Legend FuNny]

I think 1-39 is a good idea. Begous most hpc all ready went 1-39.

[debb]

also i doubt they would create more than 1 world so crashing would be worse