Seven Posted July 11, 2017 Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 On July the 3rd, ranks of Sharkbrew & representatives of various xLpcs gathered on TS for a small meeting which lasted for an hour or so. We agreed on the following: 1) Combat cap of 70 (Ascent asked for a cb 65 cap), while the 65 should stay the average ish in the memberlist. 2) No overheads in clan wars 3) Massing for trips at 4pm est, start at 4:30pm. So, as some of you have already noticed, we've decided to give xLpcs a chance at the WCOTM, in the hope of promoting wilderness & eventually clan wars activity amongst the lilguys. If everything goes by the plan, we'd also love to host a xLpc version of the RvB, probably 2v2. Currently we're waiting for all xLpc's to assign clan ambassadors, finish their memberlists & recruitment topics so we could open the WCOTM tracker. Clans who hasn't met the requirements for the WCOTM: Bad Timing @ bt black son @@byronbanks Rampage @@RyanTheG @@DLPHN GANG All suggestions regarding the point system, guidelines & rules are more than welcome. Kim 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asuna Posted July 11, 2017 Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 this sounds good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrian Posted July 11, 2017 Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 this sounds good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HATE PUBLIC RELATIONS Posted July 11, 2017 Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 point in r vs b when outburst will only break the cap like they've done over the past 3 days due to failure of their members doing their job returning/attending their trips DLPHN GANG 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kim Posted July 11, 2017 Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 point in r vs b when outburst will only break the cap like they've done over the past 3 days due to failure of their members doing their job returning/attending their trips When it comes to redvsblue, I personally make sure with my staff members if anyone is breaking the cap. HATE PUBLIC RELATIONS 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auwi Posted July 11, 2017 Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 Goodluck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaronn Posted July 11, 2017 Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 @@Seven Combat cap of 70 (Ascent asked for a cb 65 cap), while the 65 should stay the average ish in the memberlist. So punishing clans who break the rules then? or letting them get away with it like they have been for the last week or so, or can we all bring 70+ cb accounts??? DLPHN GANG and aw panic lol 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seven Posted July 11, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 @@Seven Combat cap of 70 (Ascent asked for a cb 65 cap), while the 65 should stay the average ish in the memberlist. So punishing clans who break the rules then? or letting them get away with it like they have been for the last week or so, or can we all bring 70+ cb accounts??? Feel free to start disputing them once we've started the wcotm, they'll be dealt with accordingly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juicy Posted July 11, 2017 Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 Pretty sure Theirs alot more Xlpc's they just dont use like forums and all, so will be hard for them to have things such as a ML. but great to see a good xlpc scene Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanicus Posted July 11, 2017 Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 No overs? 70 cb?So maxed accounts in xlpc - Example(70cb) This puts me off even getting involved now Should be 65-cb- without overs or 70cb with overs imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edjez Posted July 11, 2017 Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 Pretty sure Theirs alot more Xlpc's they just dont use like forums and all, so will be hard for them to have things such as a ML. but great to see a good xlpc scene No one asked for your opinion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kim Posted July 11, 2017 Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 No one asked for your opinion All suggestions regarding the point system, guidelines & rules are more than welcome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kim Posted July 11, 2017 Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 No overs? 70 cb? So maxed accounts in xlpc :/ Should be 65-cb- without overs or 70cb with overs imo. We discussed the issue thoroughly with the leaders & ranks who attended. Although, we may not all agree with their decision making, it is their scene after all. We won't standby for their combats getting any higher than 70 though as it will be suicide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seven Posted July 11, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 No overs? 70 cb? So maxed accounts in xlpc :/ Should be 65-cb- without overs or 70cb with overs imo. I'd personally prefer 65 cb too but thats what people decided on. @, you can actually create a memberlist quite easily on Sharkbrew w/o your own forums. Kanicus 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanicus Posted July 11, 2017 Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 We discussed the issue thoroughly with the leaders & ranks who attended. Although, we may not all agree with their decision making, it is their scene after all. We won't standby for their combats getting any higher than 70 though as it will be suicide.who needs over 70 cb when you can have a 70 cb maxed gmauler lol, ridiculous decision made by the people involved, smh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kim Posted July 11, 2017 Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 who needs over 70 cb when you can have a 70 cb maxed gmauler lol, ridiculous decision made by the people involved, smh. Leaders and ranks had different reasoning behind this. The only clan opposed to this decision was Ascent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanicus Posted July 11, 2017 Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 Leaders and ranks had different reasoning behind this. The only clan opposed to this decision was Ascent.What are these reasons? So people can have trihard accounts like when Fearless had maxed accounts with 1 prayer vs majority of dual 75/80 stats. Just defeats the object of xlpc needing to be maxed to compete, just when the scene was finally looking competitive and somewhat thriving, here comes the spanner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kim Posted July 11, 2017 Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 What are these reasons? So people can have trihard accounts like when Fearless had maxed accounts with 1 prayer vs majority of dual 75/80 stats. Just defeats the object of xlpc needing to be maxed to compete, just when the scene was finally looking competitive and somewhat thriving. We went in circles about how xLPC is an entry bracket for any brand-new clan. Some ranks were discussing that they have already have some 70s and don't want to take a step back. Some said they didn't want to hold back their members. From the sounds of it, a clan kinda geared them towards the level cap. Everyone wants to be on the same level so some of the clans seem to only be getting their combats higher to compete verse having level 50s. This discussion may have went for 20-30 minutes or maybe even more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanicus Posted July 11, 2017 Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 We went in circles about how xLPC is an entry bracket for any brand-new clan. Some ranks were discussing that they have already have some 70s and don't want to take a step back. Some said they didn't want to hold back their members. From the sounds of it, a clan kinda geared them towards the level cap. Everyone wants to be on the same level so some of the clans seem to only be getting their combats higher to compete verse having level 50s. This discussion may have went for 20-30 minutes or maybe even more. Keep 70 combat then just allow overheads, no overs preps are brown sticky stuff and this is just encouraging maxed accounts only to compete lol, in before dual 90 prep reqs for xlpc. Hitttaaa 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jay. Posted July 11, 2017 Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 very happy this has eatablished, last version of ascent we worked very hard to place this but did not go as planned. Can't wait to start competing with the rest of the scene! Shadows 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kim Posted July 11, 2017 Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 Keep 70 combat then just allow overheads, no overs preps are brown sticky stuff and this is just encouraging maxed accounts only to compete lol, in before dual 90 prep reqs for xlpc. no overheads is in clan wars. oops! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jay. Posted July 11, 2017 Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 no overheads is in clan wars. oops! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pun Posted July 11, 2017 Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 no overheads is in clan wars. oops!single pile preps fun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jay. Posted July 11, 2017 Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 single pile preps fun not at all actually Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadows Posted July 11, 2017 Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 No overs? 70 cb? So maxed accounts in xlpc - Example(70cb) This puts me off even getting involved now Should be 65-cb- without overs or 70cb with overs imo. We can't really go against what the clan leaders wanted The current xLPCs wanted that combat range, although I do agree that it should be below 65 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now