puppyslush Posted July 19, 2017 Report Share Posted July 19, 2017 https://www.sharkbrew.com/community/index.php?/topic/30907-new-declaration-rules/ The new rules supersede the previous changes and applies to all declarations posted after the 17th Key highlights: Minimum opt for the fight must be 20v20 or 40% of smaller clan's memberlist(whichever is higher) <-- Down from 50% Clans are given 2 weeks to respond to the declaration. Opponents shall provide a screenshot of their memberlist if necessary or else it will count as a ignore/forfeit. Clans can only declare twice(1 P2P/1 F2P) per week(every Monday 00:00 EST to Sunday 23:59 EST) against clans they had not declared on before in that month. This means clans can make up to a maximum of 8 declarations per month. <-- Clans can only declare against the same clan twice, 1 p2p 1 f2p Declaring clan receives full COTM points equivalent to a 3-0 fight for ignored declarations. <-- You will receive COTM according to the opts declared, e.g. +2 for 40v40, etc. Do note that all anti prep farming point deduction apply so if you prepped a clan more than twice in a month, you shouldn't declare on them in the last 2 weeks. Ignoring/forfeiting a declaration will result in a 3 point penalty from final COTM score <-- We felt that auto DQ from COTM and WCOTM was too harsh. In the past 2 COTMs, The 3 clans with the highest points in the last 2 COTMs were within 3 points of each other and thus this point penalty should be suffice in tipping the balance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigmanting Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 First i guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warbow Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 LAme. Imagine if the government made us eat certain foods. Let's them prep who they want Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puppyslush Posted July 20, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 LAme. Imagine if the government made us eat certain foods. Let's them prep who they want https://www.usnews.com/news/the-report/articles/2015/06/05/the-great-government-takeover-of-food First there were nutrition guidelines, then nutrition labels. Now, the government is telling schools what to serve their students. Next, it is set to ban some ingredients from the market and require menu labeling. Trajan 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simpler Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 Looks good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DULL Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 sounds good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UB Public Relations Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 LAme. Imagine if the government made us eat certain foods. Let's them prep who they want They can prep who they want, they just cant win awards for being the "best" clanwars clan when they are actively avoiding certain clans. Nobody is forcing these clans to do anything, just making it blatantly obvious that they are dodging clans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxx Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 LAme. Imagine if the government made us eat certain foods. Let's them prep who they wantYou can't just eat one thing all the time because you're scared of other dishes lmfao Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BERB0M Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corn_husker Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 Lol u nerds play runescape while I get head, log in for 1 hour and win 3-0 btw lol bigmanting 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auwi Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 Wow grat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murd Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 The only thing that still stands out to me as unreasonable is this. Ignoring/forfeiting a declaration will result in a 3 point penalty from final COTM score <-- We felt that auto DQ from COTM and WCOTM was too harsh. In the past 2 COTMs, The 3 clans with the highest points in the last 2 COTMs were within 3 points of each other and thus this point penalty should be suffice in tipping the balance. There shouldn't be a largely harsh punishment for ignoring a declaration because some clans can't pull/will never fight a specific clan for whatever reason (please refrain from replying with repetitive comments about current clanning situations in terms of prepping one another). The notable reason is the can't pull/different tiers in quality. If Unbreakable declared on AAO, more or less AAO will ignore because of A, pulls and B, it's Unbreakable (quality difference tends to be largely different). Maybe there should be a harsh-ish penalty for clans that are considered high tier and ignoring, however when it's two clans on completely different levels it seems rather harsh to penalize that much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trajan Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 Gz UB on cotm indefinitely Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 The only thing that still stands out to me as unreasonable is this. Ignoring/forfeiting a declaration will result in a 3 point penalty from final COTM score <-- We felt that auto DQ from COTM and WCOTM was too harsh. In the past 2 COTMs, The 3 clans with the highest points in the last 2 COTMs were within 3 points of each other and thus this point penalty should be suffice in tipping the balance. There shouldn't be a largely harsh punishment for ignoring a declaration because some clans can't pull/will never fight a specific clan for whatever reason (please refrain from replying with repetitive comments about current clanning situations in terms of prepping one another). The notable reason is the can't pull/different tiers in quality. If Unbreakable declared on AAO, more or less AAO will ignore because of A, pulls and B, it's Unbreakable (quality difference tends to be largely different). Maybe there should be a harsh-ish penalty for clans that are considered high tier and ignoring, however when it's two clans on completely different levels it seems rather harsh to penalize that much. Clan of the month is meant for the best clan not the lowest tier a clan like AAO wouldn't win any ways Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crunk Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 Foeop will still dodge UB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevv Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 The only thing that still stands out to me as unreasonable is this. Ignoring/forfeiting a declaration will result in a 3 point penalty from final COTM score <-- We felt that auto DQ from COTM and WCOTM was too harsh. In the past 2 COTMs, The 3 clans with the highest points in the last 2 COTMs were within 3 points of each other and thus this point penalty should be suffice in tipping the balance. There shouldn't be a largely harsh punishment for ignoring a declaration because some clans can't pull/will never fight a specific clan for whatever reason (please refrain from replying with repetitive comments about current clanning situations in terms of prepping one another). The notable reason is the can't pull/different tiers in quality. If Unbreakable declared on AAO, more or less AAO will ignore because of A, pulls and B, it's Unbreakable (quality difference tends to be largely different). Maybe there should be a harsh-ish penalty for clans that are considered high tier and ignoring, however when it's two clans on completely different levels it seems rather harsh to penalize that much. ub already declared on #2 and #3 clan so don't expect them to do that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanicus Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 Gz Ub Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terror Spokesman Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 Maybe some clans should just prep instead of avoiding :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
puppyslush Posted July 20, 2017 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 The only thing that still stands out to me as unreasonable is this. Ignoring/forfeiting a declaration will result in a 3 point penalty from final COTM score <-- We felt that auto DQ from COTM and WCOTM was too harsh. In the past 2 COTMs, The 3 clans with the highest points in the last 2 COTMs were within 3 points of each other and thus this point penalty should be suffice in tipping the balance. There shouldn't be a largely harsh punishment for ignoring a declaration because some clans can't pull/will never fight a specific clan for whatever reason (please refrain from replying with repetitive comments about current clanning situations in terms of prepping one another). The notable reason is the can't pull/different tiers in quality. If Unbreakable declared on AAO, more or less AAO will ignore because of A, pulls and B, it's Unbreakable (quality difference tends to be largely different). Maybe there should be a harsh-ish penalty for clans that are considered high tier and ignoring, however when it's two clans on completely different levels it seems rather harsh to penalize that much. That's why i reduce minimum opt from 50% of ml to 40%. If you cant scrape 40% of your ml or 20 people, you shouldn't be open. Ignoring while going ahead to farm other clans for wins should not be an option at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edjez Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peace seeker Posted July 20, 2017 Report Share Posted July 20, 2017 gz i guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holiday Posted July 25, 2017 Report Share Posted July 25, 2017 ah yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoJo Posted August 8, 2017 Report Share Posted August 8, 2017 sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now