Demotion

[slushpuppy]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1z4YoGqyM

A Sharkbrew rank was demoted for publicly defending a video that depicts 50~ mains hitting random pures without restraint. He/she may be repromoted if justifications for hitting those pures is sound but as it stands by arguments made, it appears that an entire clan(s) is paying the price for the folly of 1 member- this should not be condoned as representative of sharkbrew rank behavior.

 

 

[SKEEZ]

unlucky @holydreams

[Unbiased Reporter]

EoM is ass lmfao, 1 month till they got only mains

[holydreams]

26 minutes ago, Skeez said:

unlucky @holydreams

Actually I’m pretty lucky, Amsterdam was crazy

[PICwarior381]

Who is that man !

[Honest Abe]

OH NO NOT A SHARKBREW.COM DEMOTION YIKES :/ THIS WILL BE TOUGH TO RECOVER FROM

[AMENTIFRMEOP]

[Lionel]

Only god can judge us

[Jordai]

55 minutes ago, holydreams said:

Actually I’m pretty lucky, Amsterdam was crazy

my boy danny lmfaoooo 

[Conor McGregor]

@Jordai paid $200 to get applicant on a mmorpg and to be liked by randoms on the internet l0l

[SKEEZ]

1 hour ago, holydreams said:

Actually I’m pretty lucky, Amsterdam was crazy

[Warbow]

Eop is a bottom tier main clan

[spy4hire]

@Jordai speak up lmfao

[Conor McGregor]

Actually your staff have clearly stated that retaliation against fom if they continued is justified and fine as stated in @Kim in her topic:

On 12/8/2017 at 1:25 PM, Kim said:

In recent events, both clans have declared to not take things outside of the game. They have the agreement if someones tries to dox one of their members that, they will take actions their own hands to stop the issue at hand.  This is a right step into the future! I hope other clans in our community will follow EOP's and FOE's steps to keep the game healthier. 

What are your thoughts on these two topics?

  Reveal hidden contents

 

So @slushpuppy why have you not demoted sharkbrew ranks in fom and apex clans for publicly defending their doxing of members of sharkbrew and the pure community? You even allow them to insinuate conflict by using the doxed information on both your site and irc (particularly letting them use irl attacks towards @17_ and banning any eop who defend him)?

 

And also, why are you demoting a staff for wanting to remove doxing from the community yet you are allowing your other staff (in fom/apex) to publicly attack a fellow staff member (which to my recollection is punishable conduct)?

"lol imagine actually trying to justify this behavior like the bitch victim you've always been" - directed towards a fellow staff member in retaliation for a typical statement of how bad apex (not the individual) is

 

With all of this in mind @slushpuppy why are you demoting one for doing good for the community by providing incentive not to dox people (which is 10x more severe than bringing mains) and keeping a useless gatekeeper who gloryhunted to rsw and attacks his fellow staff because he can't handle clanning banter?

[Honest Abe]

@slushpuppy @Kim all i know is LV2 has posted @17_'s dox 4 times on Fo Forums... yet he still in Fo 0 punishment from their officials.

We we're nice enough to let you guys play mediator and give your website some relevance, but you failed to act or enforce any punishment on a clan openly promoting the doxing of other community members. God only knows how @holydreams is still a sharkbrew official while leading a clan openly doxing other Sharkbrew community members :/ Guess we have to handle this ourselves!!!

[DULL]

darn................!!!!

[Conor McGregor]

@slushpuppy @Lenin @Moni @Kim @Andy can we get a response? Because it looks like demoting the rank was a bias decision considering you yourselves told everyone that "any retaliation was justified if fom or their members continued to dox".

[AMENTIFRMEOP]

6 minutes ago, DULL said:

darn................!!!!

that was quick haha

[Honest Abe]

43 minutes ago, Conor McGregor said:

@slushpuppy @Lenin @Moni @Kim @Andy can we get a response? Because it looks like demoting the rank was a bias decision considering you yourselves told everyone that "any retaliation was justified if fom or their members continued to dox".

i still don't get it?

SO FoM doxes EOP members..

EOP respectfully doesn't leak any FOM members IRL info contacts SB to help mediate 

FOM EOP SB agree that anyone leaking IRL info will be dealt with immediately by that clan if not any action taken by the other clan in retaliation is justified

FOM member then continues to post EOP members irl info

FOM FAKE removes the member and allows him to attend there weekend trip on his 20 def account

FOM then gives him his forums access his back

FOM member continues to release EOP member's IRL information without any punishment from FOM clan

EOP finally retaliates as discussed SEVERAL times with SB BUT instead of releasing FOM clan members IRL info we keep it in game

 

EOP mod gets demoted

FOM mod and Leader of doxing FOM clan no punishment

??? @slushpuppy @Kim @Lenin @Andy @Moni

 

IMA NEED A GOOD AS FUG ANSWER B4 I GET INVOLVED XD

[Conor McGregor]

4 minutes ago, Wiggerslayer said:

i still don't get it?

SO FoM doxes EOP members..

EOP respectfully doesn't leak any FOM members IRL info contacts SB to help mediate 

FOM EOP SB agree that anyone leaking IRL info will be dealt with immediately by that clan if not any action taken by the other clan in retaliation is justified

FOM member then continues to post EOP members irl info

FOM FAKE removes the member and allows him to attend there weekend trip on his 20 def account

FOM then gives him his forums access his back

FOM member continues to release EOP member's IRL information without any punishment from FOM clan

EOP finally retaliates as discussed SEVERAL times with SB BUT instead of releasing FOM clan members IRL info we keep it in game

 

EOP mod gets demoted

FOM mod and Leader of doxing FOM clan no punishment

??? @slushpuppy @Kim @Lenin @Andy @Moni

 

IMA NEED A GOOD AS FUG ANSWER B4 I GET INVOLVED XD

Funny how that Fom leader that continued the doxing and gave the member his rank back is a rank on sharkbrew?

[Conor McGregor]

@Kim you did communicate with your fellow sb ranks about how you told us specifically that if fom continued doxing, any retaliation we do is justified as it is now in our hands, not sharkbrew's, right? Because it would be a really major lack of communication if you forgot to mention that!

[Kim]

Just now, Conor McGregor said:

@Kim you did communicate with your fellow sb ranks about how you told us specifically that if fom continued doxing, any retaliation we do is justified as it is now in our hands, not sharkbrew's, right? Because it would be a really major lack of communication if you forgot to mention that!

17's & LV2's hands. Not EOP's hands. 

[Honest Abe]

5 minutes ago, Conor McGregor said:

@Kim you did communicate with your fellow sb ranks about how you told us specifically that if fom continued doxing, any retaliation we do is justified as it is now in our hands, not sharkbrew's, right? Because it would be a really major lack of communication if you forgot to mention that!

@Kim ??? im not sure if you're not caught up but you are aware that it isn't JUST 17 he's posted IRL info for correct?

@holydreams can confirm he also posted IRL info for a EOP member Kavi including family irls' fb links ect.

YIKES clear bias going on here.

[Conor McGregor]

5 minutes ago, Kim said:

17's & LV2's hands. Not EOP's hands. 

Nah ah don't change it hun

They have the agreement if someones tries to dox one of their members that, they will take actions their own hands to stop the issue at hand.  This is a right step into the future! I hope other clans in our community will follow EOP's and FOE's steps to keep the game healthier. 

This is not an individual agreement, it is a clan agreement between the clans. You can't change the story that easy darling. It is not only between 17 and ;v2, as you so publicly stated on that topic..

[rot rock nigga]

yikes sb...