auwi Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 @Jamzright now Dynamic 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
del Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 4 minutes ago, Dynamic said: the only time outrage beat us was on corp hill this saturday after crashing our fight with rage lmao 40-1 for foe atm Crash you? HAHAHAHAHAHHAA https://outrage-rs.org/community/index.php?/topic/1811-/ You literally rushed us as we were about to take on Supremacy and got your asses fucking handed to hubert 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GlGGS Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
del Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 12 minutes ago, Auwi said: Jesus you didnt have to reply with an entire topic. At work rn so I'll respond to your first sentence. Outrage is not even a new clan, every single one of your members are recycled members of closed clans in the past. Not a single person in your memberbase has never pure clanned before. So in that respect, you have no excuses. Hahaha, we've set the bar so fucking high that you actually consider us a legacy clan. I actually take that as a compliment, because if this is us now, 3 months in, you better pray to whatever god you believe in that we stop progressing as you are finding it this hard to keep up with 15 EoP, 19 IR and 9 Fi members out of a 85 man memberlist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godfather Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 6 minutes ago, Auwi said: Jesus you didnt have to reply with an entire topic. At work rn so I'll respond to your first sentence. Outrage is not even a new clan, every single one of your members are recycled members of closed clans in the past. Not a single person in your memberbase has never pure clanned before. So in that respect, you have no excuses. if we're not a new clan because we have veterans of the game, you're a shit nameless clan with no history because you're infested with kids that begun clanning this year. hubert 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
del Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 2 minutes ago, Godfather said: if we're not a new clan because we have veterans of the game, you're a shit nameless clan with no history because you're infested with kids that begun clanning this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Rockefeller Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 25 minutes ago, Auwi said: Jesus you didnt have to reply with an entire topic. At work rn so I'll respond to your first sentence. Outrage is not even a new clan, every single one of your members are recycled members of closed clans in the past. Not a single person in your memberbase has never pure clanned before. So in that respect, you have no excuses. Stfu Kim lmfao Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLOWER Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 Topic Added To League Table Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lookwhatidid Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 on gang NO LONG TLK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 Ahhh yes still the best Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Rockefeller Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 5 minutes ago, lookwhatidid said: on gang NO LONG TLK hi erik Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auwi Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 17 minutes ago, Godfather said: if we're not a new clan because we have veterans of the game, you're a shit nameless clan with no history because you're infested with kids that begun clanning this year. Woah relax buddy, all I'm saying is that it's hypocritical for Outrage to complain about Foe running when Outrage ran from Foe for months. Now that the roles have reversed you want to start complaining? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Rockefeller Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 1 hour ago, Auwi said: Woah relax buddy, all I'm saying is that it's hypocritical for Outrage to complain about Foe running when Outrage ran from Foe for months. Now that the roles have reversed you want to start complaining? stop avoiding KIM LMFAOOOOO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K0nt Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 Gz foe! ty for clean action as always Dynamic 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
del Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 5 minutes ago, coolguy4731 said: stop avoiding KIM LMFAOOOOO its ok: https://gyazo.com/0de1a2ae2271caae5a3f086ea453c120 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
موني Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 2 hours ago, Auwi said: Jesus you didnt have to reply with an entire topic. At work rn so I'll respond to your first sentence. Outrage is not even a new clan, every single one of your members are recycled members of closed clans in the past. Not a single person in your memberbase has never pure clanned before. So in that respect, you have no excuses. U got a tldr by the looks of it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godfather Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 1 hour ago, Auwi said: Woah relax buddy, all I'm saying is that it's hypocritical for Outrage to complain about Foe running when Outrage ran from Foe for months. Now that the roles have reversed you want to start complaining? it's not hypocritical, the difference is that you attempted to force a rivalry with us and are now unwilling to commit to the fight in which you started. play victim all you like, just like the last time i was active. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ram Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 Foe ranks: don't reply on outrage's topic shhhh.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auwi Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 8 minutes ago, Godfather said: it's not hypocritical, the difference is that you attempted to force a rivalry with us and are now unwilling to commit to the fight in which you started. play victim all you like, just like the last time i was active. I'm not even in Foe nevertheless supporting them, Outrage is clearly winning the rivalry. All I said was that it's hypocritical to complain about them never wanting to fight you when you guys clearly did the same thing when you first opened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Rockefeller Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 18 minutes ago, Auwi said: I'm not even in Foe nevertheless supporting them, Outrage is clearly winning the rivalry. All I said was that it's hypocritical to complain about them never wanting to fight you when you guys clearly did the same thing when you first opened. Unbiased The rivalry just started, Foe and outrage are even opts rn. The upcoming months will decide who will win this rivalry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murd Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 10 minutes ago, Auwi said: I'm not even in Foe nevertheless supporting them, Outrage is clearly winning the rivalry. All I said was that it's hypocritical to complain about them never wanting to fight you when you guys clearly did the same thing when you first opened. To be fair, hypocritical would imply they were in similar positions. Outrage opened neutrally, fo had at least +30 on them for most of the initial trips and made it their lifes goal to start a rivalry and dox/nh them. Naturally, there was no point for outrage to take part in the faux rivalry to appease people with some kind of ego disorder. Now that it is even, the once very egotistical individuals are playing victim and avoiding. I think the major difference now is that the playing fields are more even. Weird flexing had been going on and now it's really biting back hard. hubert 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Rockefeller Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 39 minutes ago, Jamz said: its ok: https://gyazo.com/0de1a2ae2271caae5a3f086ea453c120 LOOOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lnfamous Jet Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 Foe on top ceZa 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erik Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 Fo slump foe pulls 75 kings K0nt, Colin and ceZa 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auwi Posted September 16, 2019 Report Share Posted September 16, 2019 1 hour ago, Murd said: To be fair, hypocritical would imply they were in similar positions. Outrage opened neutrally, fo had at least +30 on them for most of the initial trips and made it their lifes goal to start a rivalry and dox/nh them. Naturally, there was no point for outrage to take part in the faux rivalry to appease people with some kind of ego disorder. Now that it is even, the once very egotistical individuals are playing victim and avoiding. I think the major difference now is that the playing fields are more even. Weird flexing had been going on and now it's really biting back hard. I dont really care for who is neutral and who isnt, or if one side is playing the victim or not. All I stated was that Outrage ran from Foe for months, now that the roles have reversed, wouldn't they expect the same? Shouldn't Foe be the ones running from Outrage now? You guys are really reading into this too deeply and inserting your own claims without reading what I initially said in this topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now