Jump to content

Mg F T W

Member
  • Posts

    41
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mg F T W

  1. I don't get it. What is the incentive for people listening? It's as if you're selling air for $5. No one's going to buy it.

    Do you really think that when clans are faced with conflicting values (e.g. fighting honourably vs winning) that they will pick honour and fight with no mains when others by default have an advantage? If you want this to work, you have to provide some real incentives or benefits for the proposal. 

  2. In attempt to combat this dilemma, people tend to apply the same framework to provide some novel solution. Namely, they provide answers to the question of "how can we maintain [honour/fun/insert whatever feature of the community we value] in the face [trolls/mains/insert whatever other feature that negatively impacts the community we value]?". Maybe it's time to rid yourselves free of the framework that attempts to provide solutions because it may be that very framework that puts you into the dilemma. Put more bluntly, do something else about it. 

     

    MG F T W

  3. it's not hard to record crashing a fight after a clan clears another clan and claim you cleared the clan that cleared the other clan not seen in vid. think about it. makes for good propaganda. why would a failing clan admit to failing btw? that'd all be for the means of closing, and being misfits is asking for brown sticky stuff from PX, they're going to get just that. time will tell what will happen, but for now, I can say PX and Misfits is going into a rivalry on the opening of PX right off the bat. Ahahaha.  @Misfits, just remember - you wanted this..

     

    Join Phoenix @ http://www.px-rs.com

    ok ty for the clarification; things seem to make a little more sense now. btw which clan are you in, you seem like a nice guy.

  4. Look @ Kaz's PoV, you can see Phoenix clearing Apex - Misfits rushes in to try to crash as PX teleports out. 2nd hit is a clean 1vs1 clear on Misfits, who do you think is lying? The truth isn't hidden nor covered up, and you can see Misfits camping our topic. Their whole clan is categorized as brown sticky stuff talkers with false propaganda. Let's face facts, Misfits is slumping mate. Clearly we have no problem generating a high pull for PX, including double opts of Misfits lmfao. Misfits isn't in the slightest of a worry for Phoenix, just wish they could learn to be better competition 1vs1 rather then just attempting to crash our fights every time we turn around, l000l

    Ok I just viewed your POV, but they claim to have also another POV that shows them pushing you away from a fight. I understand that there is another clan that tried to crash, but what happened in the end? Because if it's true that they are slumping, why are they not being honest about it? They keep saying that you photoshopped the fight (but I don't believe that). So who ended up staying in the wild till the end?

  5. Ok, something fishy is going on here. The topic title claims to have dominated certain clans in the wild. However, those other clans also claim to dominate this clan, for e.g., "MISFITS SUNDAY SWARM Ft. Peenix killed/SV/Apex/IR/SV/EOP/FOE" is a title of another topic posted just recently. Who is lying? I want to see more honesty from both topic posters. We want a transparent and just system of fact reporting. 

  6. 1. Mayhem Makers

    2. Final Ownage Elite

    3. Fatality (the kings of F2P at one point and no one could stop em)

    4. Eruption of Pures

    5. Corrupt Pures

    6. Epidemic

    7. The Hatred

    8. Destructive Pures

    9. The Last Pures

    10. Malice

    11. Mid-Generation

    12. Complete Domination

    13. Intense Redemption

    14. Calamity

    15. V0ltage Pures (V0P)
    16. Carpediem

    This is an overall F2P based list.

  7. This won't work. The problem stems from various sources.

     

    Off the top of my mind:

    1. The categorization of pures appears counterintuitive (e.g. MM would be considered an MPC?)
    2. Assume a member of an MPC clan was hacked to 30 defence. Also assume that the clan keeps him in. It seems odd to say they are now an HPC because of 1 instance of a 30 def pure. I also do not think that the member's defence will outweigh his ties to the clan he wants to be a part of.
    3. The fact that clans will be labelled something different from what they currently are now does not change the fact that clans will bring mains. For example, how will classifying EOP, CP (or whomever) as an HPC stop them from bringing mains?

    It's not a matter of classifying pures differently, it's about motivating the community to change their standards. It's a matter of each clan agreeing to abide by certain norms and conventions. But what incentives do they have? Given that they have pures already over 20 defence, I don't think they want to create other accounts. 

     

    There seems to be three ways to proceed:

    1. Work with Jagex to enforce standards (whatever they may be)
    2. Embrace the fact that the state of affairs dictate "pure" clans ought to become mains.
    3. Change standards to a hybrid clan (1-99 defence).
  8. It should either be 1-25 def or 1-29 def. The reason behind these numbers concerns room for error (e.g. some person receives def xp because they had defence mode on). 

     

    As for the first option, it allows room for those p2p robes. The second option allows room for further defence xp mistakes to occur but limits the model of the pure on a mithril scheme rather than that of addy. 

     

    However, the ideal should be that pures are aiming to have 20 (f2p) or 25 (p2p) defence. The reason for the 25 or 29 def cap is to allow for space for error. 

     

    One may be inclined to have a 30 def cap, but reasons for this most likely stem from being accustomed to how things currently are. Rather, one should be concerned with how things ought to be. Placing the cap at 25 or 29 def will restore warring and clanning dynamics to the way things were. In addition, the relevant difference between a 1 defence pure vs. a 20 defence pure is much more closer and relevant compared to a 1 defence pure vs. a 30 defence pure.

×
×
  • Create New...