Misfits Public Relations

Many times with the current clan leaderships, what the ranks are telling their members and what's actually going on behind the scenes are two very different things.

When two of the largest clans, some of the med pulling clans, and more are all off each other, it reduces action for everyone involved, especially those allied with each other who refuse to fight.
The fo leadership leaks were pretty telling. Do you agree with the new reliance on allies that the scene has had lately?

















 
Having 3-4 clans constantly "off" each other during trips refusing to fight leads to events like these:

 
If you're a member of FO/Z/A I encourage you to question your leadership about the amount of teaming going on. Ask them why their alliances are more important than action on trips....
 

 
 

                                                                         


We organized a big mini vs BP for today and massed up a strong 33 Bears.
We took the 2-0 win in sets and went 4-1 in rounds.
Thanks for the action, BP! Always appreciated.

 
Set 1

Attacking
Win
Rage Starting Opts: 24
Rage Ending Opts: 12
 

Defending
Loss

PKRI
Win
Rage Starting Opts: 24
Rage Ending Opts: 17
 
Set 2

Defending
Win
Rage Starting Opts: 24
Rage Ending Opts: 16
 

Attacking
Win
Rage Starting Opts: 24
Rage Ending Opts: 14




                                                                         


We organized a big mini vs BP for today and massed up a strong 33 Bears.
We took the 2-0 win in sets and went 4-1 in rounds.
Thanks for the action, BP! Always appreciated.

 
Set 1

Attacking
Win
Rage Starting Opts: 24
Rage Ending Opts: 12
 

Defending
Loss

PKRI
Win
Rage Starting Opts: 24
Rage Ending Opts: 17
 
Set 2

Defending
Win
Rage Starting Opts: 24
Rage Ending Opts: 16
 

Attacking
Win
Rage Starting Opts: 24
Rage Ending Opts: 14




                                                                         


We organized a big mini vs BP for today and massed up a strong 33 Bears.
We took the 2-0 win in sets and went 4-1 in rounds.
Thanks for the action, BP! Always appreciated.

 
Set 1

Attacking
Win
Rage Starting Opts: 24
Rage Ending Opts: 12
 

Defending
Loss

PKRI
Win
Rage Starting Opts: 24
Rage Ending Opts: 17
 
Set 2

Defending
Win
Rage Starting Opts: 24
Rage Ending Opts: 16
 

Attacking
Win
Rage Starting Opts: 24
Rage Ending Opts: 14




How can you expect clans to showup to clusters when you clearly would off each other and team on them if they did? These GDZ clusters, as shown by the logs above, are done to "bait" out other clans so you can team. Imagine how fun it would be if we could have every clan at GDZ duking it out for hours on a weekend. Alliances, like yours, prevent it.

Many times with the current clan leaderships, what the ranks are telling their members and what's actually going on behind the scenes are two very different things.

When two of the largest clans, some of the med pulling clans, and more are all off each other, it reduces action for everyone involved, especially those allied with each other who refuse to fight.
The fo leadership leaks were pretty telling. Do you agree with the new reliance on allies that the scene has had lately?

















 
Having 3-4 clans constantly "off" each other during trips refusing to fight leads to events like these:

 
If you're a member of FO/Z/A I encourage you to question your leadership about the amount of teaming going on. Ask them why their alliances are more important than action on trips....
 

 
 

Many times with the current clan leaderships, what the ranks are telling their members and what's actually going on behind the scenes are two very different things.

When two of the largest clans, some of the med pulling clans, and more are all off each other, it reduces action for everyone involved, especially those allied with each other who refuse to fight.
The fo leadership leaks were pretty telling. Do you agree with the new reliance on allies that the scene has had lately?

















 
Having 3-4 clans constantly "off" each other during trips refusing to fight leads to events like these:

 
If you're a member of FO/Z/A I encourage you to question your leadership about the amount of teaming going on. Ask them why their alliances are more important than action on trips....
 

 
 

Many times with the current clan leaderships, what the ranks are telling their members and what's actually going on behind the scenes are two very different things.

When two of the largest clans, some of the med pulling clans, and more are all off each other, it reduces action for everyone involved, especially those allied with each other who refuse to fight.
The fo leadership leaks were pretty telling. Do you agree with the new reliance on allies that the scene has had lately?

















 
Having 3-4 clans constantly "off" each other during trips refusing to fight leads to events like these:

 
If you're a member of FO/Z/A I encourage you to question your leadership about the amount of teaming going on. Ask them why their alliances are more important than action on trips....
 

 
 

The post literally shows that you're spamming for LY while they're in caves fighting Apex and you were going to 2v1, so we said we would help.
It's a damn shame, too.

Even if, let's say, there was a 2v1 vs Z, how would it not be justified or expected given the months and months of alliances being built on your side?

It's pretty obvious who relies on who during these fights, and if your clan wanted to be self-reliant, it could be. Instead, you'd rather bow to FO, as you're scared they'd win if you actually tried to fight the second highest pulling clan, and use Apex as a slave clan if you're ever in a situation where you don't have +opts.

Many times with the current clan leaderships, what the ranks are telling their members and what's actually going on behind the scenes are two very different things.

When two of the largest clans, some of the med pulling clans, and more are all off each other, it reduces action for everyone involved, especially those allied with each other who refuse to fight.
The fo leadership leaks were pretty telling. Do you agree with the new reliance on allies that the scene has had lately?

















 
Having 3-4 clans constantly "off" each other during trips refusing to fight leads to events like these:

 
If you're a member of FO/Z/A I encourage you to question your leadership about the amount of teaming going on. Ask them why their alliances are more important than action on trips....
 

 
 

Many times with the current clan leaderships, what the ranks are telling their members and what's actually going on behind the scenes are two very different things.

When two of the largest clans, some of the med pulling clans, and more are all off each other, it reduces action for everyone involved, especially those allied with each other who refuse to fight.
The fo leadership leaks were pretty telling. Do you agree with the new reliance on allies that the scene has had lately?

















 
Having 3-4 clans constantly "off" each other during trips refusing to fight leads to events like these:

 
If you're a member of FO/Z/A I encourage you to question your leadership about the amount of teaming going on. Ask them why their alliances are more important than action on trips....
 

 
 

How can you expect clans to showup to clusters when you clearly would off each other and team on them if they did? These GDZ clusters, as shown by the logs above, are done to "bait" out other clans so you can team. Imagine how fun it would be if we could have every clan at GDZ duking it out for hours on a weekend. Alliances, like yours, prevent it.

Many times with the current clan leaderships, what the ranks are telling their members and what's actually going on behind the scenes are two very different things.

When two of the largest clans, some of the med pulling clans, and more are all off each other, it reduces action for everyone involved, especially those allied with each other who refuse to fight.
The fo leadership leaks were pretty telling. Do you agree with the new reliance on allies that the scene has had lately?

















 
Having 3-4 clans constantly "off" each other during trips refusing to fight leads to events like these:

 
If you're a member of FO/Z/A I encourage you to question your leadership about the amount of teaming going on. Ask them why their alliances are more important than action on trips....
 

 
 

Many times with the current clan leaderships, what the ranks are telling their members and what's actually going on behind the scenes are two very different things.

When two of the largest clans, some of the med pulling clans, and more are all off each other, it reduces action for everyone involved, especially those allied with each other who refuse to fight.
The fo leadership leaks were pretty telling. Do you agree with the new reliance on allies that the scene has had lately?

















 
Having 3-4 clans constantly "off" each other during trips refusing to fight leads to events like these:

 
If you're a member of FO/Z/A I encourage you to question your leadership about the amount of teaming going on. Ask them why their alliances are more important than action on trips....
 

 
 

What would you do if Rage or Legacy showed up at those fights on pures to make a cluster on the weekends? Clearly, as you said yourself in the logs in this topic, you only fight them/go gdz/etc to "bait" us out so that you can team.

What does Rage do, for example, when we're in a cluster with Fatality or Legacy? We fight them.

That's the difference between my clan and yours. You will always bend the knee and look for cheap wins, and my clan will always fight 1v1.
If you'd like clean action, we'd be happy to fight you in CWA, clean No mains, no +opts, no teaming, no bullshit. Any day of the week, either server @Co0kiezsInterested? If you really don't need to team with FOE/APEX, this really should be a no-brainer, right? Accept the fight.

The post literally shows that you're spamming for LY while they're in caves fighting Apex and you were going to 2v1, so we said we would help.
It's a damn shame, too.

Even if, let's say, there was a 2v1 vs Z, how would it not be justified or expected given the months and months of alliances being built on your side?

It's pretty obvious who relies on who during these fights, and if your clan wanted to be self-reliant, it could be. Instead, you'd rather bow to FO, as you're scared they'd win if you actually tried to fight the second highest pulling clan, and use Apex as a slave clan if you're ever in a situation where you don't have +opts.

How can you expect clans to showup to clusters when you clearly would off each other and team on them if they did? These GDZ clusters, as shown by the logs above, are done to "bait" out other clans so you can team. Imagine how fun it would be if we could have every clan at GDZ duking it out for hours on a weekend. Alliances, like yours, prevent it.

What would you do if Rage or Legacy showed up at those fights on pures to make a cluster on the weekends? Clearly, as you said yourself in the logs in this topic, you only fight them/go gdz/etc to "bait" us out so that you can team.

What does Rage do, for example, when we're in a cluster with Fatality or Legacy? We fight them.

That's the difference between my clan and yours. You will always bend the knee and look for cheap wins, and my clan will always fight 1v1.
If you'd like clean action, we'd be happy to fight you in CWA, clean No mains, no +opts, no teaming, no bullshit. Any day of the week, either server @Co0kiezsInterested? If you really don't need to team with FOE/APEX, this really should be a no-brainer, right? Accept the fight.

How can you expect clans to showup to clusters when you clearly would off each other and team on them if they did? These GDZ clusters, as shown by the logs above, are done to "bait" out other clans so you can team. Imagine how fun it would be if we could have every clan at GDZ duking it out for hours on a weekend. Alliances, like yours, prevent it.

The post literally shows that you're spamming for LY while they're in caves fighting Apex and you were going to 2v1, so we said we would help.
It's a damn shame, too.

Even if, let's say, there was a 2v1 vs Z, how would it not be justified or expected given the months and months of alliances being built on your side?

It's pretty obvious who relies on who during these fights, and if your clan wanted to be self-reliant, it could be. Instead, you'd rather bow to FO, as you're scared they'd win if you actually tried to fight the second highest pulling clan, and use Apex as a slave clan if you're ever in a situation where you don't have +opts.

Many times with the current clan leaderships, what the ranks are telling their members and what's actually going on behind the scenes are two very different things.

When two of the largest clans, some of the med pulling clans, and more are all off each other, it reduces action for everyone involved, especially those allied with each other who refuse to fight.
The fo leadership leaks were pretty telling. Do you agree with the new reliance on allies that the scene has had lately?

















 
Having 3-4 clans constantly "off" each other during trips refusing to fight leads to events like these:

 
If you're a member of FO/Z/A I encourage you to question your leadership about the amount of teaming going on. Ask them why their alliances are more important than action on trips....
 

 
 

Many times with the current clan leaderships, what the ranks are telling their members and what's actually going on behind the scenes are two very different things.

When two of the largest clans, some of the med pulling clans, and more are all off each other, it reduces action for everyone involved, especially those allied with each other who refuse to fight.
The fo leadership leaks were pretty telling. Do you agree with the new reliance on allies that the scene has had lately?

















 
Having 3-4 clans constantly "off" each other during trips refusing to fight leads to events like these:

 
If you're a member of FO/Z/A I encourage you to question your leadership about the amount of teaming going on. Ask them why their alliances are more important than action on trips....
 

 
 

I think the fact that some of these clans pre-emptively plan on teaming on others during the weekend is the issue. It's been years since clans have been independent. 
 
I imagine one of the reason clan wars is pretty dead and most seem scared of it is because people like k2p can't slide into cookies dm and put the siren on during a cwa fight. Hopefully clans will start working on their own, and also decide to drop the excessive mains and vennies in the near future.