tesco

no ask

I am disappointed that we are allying with 0-36ality
 
It's like Germany allying with Italy who couldn't defeat the Egyptian camel brigade

everyone that wasnt in that ts

i wouldn't tag "dalecapone" in this he's already stated that he's a fanboy of one of the clans being discussed in this topic
also u vape irl 
 
u play rs nice life bundle of twigs

Ruin wins again
gz Andre
gz Ruin

They managed to take Sv's title of worst HPC of 2016, congratulations.
 
Mayhem opened as a clan a little under a month ago, mass recruiting everybody and anybody they could who hated TLP. From the get go, their clan was infested with spies and leaks(we've had multiple people leaking their staff chan and boards since before they were even open) not to mention the glory hunters.
 
Their pulls went from 44 > 33 > 21(today) and now they have finally closed, not even coming close to their goal of 'destroying TLP'(taken from their first member boards topic), only making us stronger.
 
RIP
 

 
 
looks like they are mass joining fo
 

Just a few points I wanted some information on about the legitimacy of this cauliflower ass tournament hosted by @Andre`
 
scheduling / default times? No default times or dates were set if the matches didn't happen before the time period in which all clans had to complete their minis. TLP asked RD every day / most hours each day to mini RD for the 10v10 but when RD goes running to the host 20 minutes before the time runs out (supposedly after waiting up into the night for GMT and not even querying TLP for the 10v10) they asked for TLP to forfeit since we "refused" to do the war. We were then told we have 2 minutes to mass up and fight with whatever we can even if we pull less than 10, because the judges would rule in RD's favour even though RD tactically planned out to forfeit TLP. From this point, @Andre` pressured TLP into doing a 10v10 with literally anybody they could find - even inactive members who don't even like to P2P. Bottom line is regulations weren't in place for the tournament nor was any room for compromise - we were told fight or forfeit even though RD avoided us the first two days.
free passes Nobody can deny that FOE have a lot of free passes to finals and semi-finals of the 30v30 / 50v50 fights vs TLP/EOP with no actual reasoning in place. The host of this tournament is also hosted by a FOE member. Coincidence? 
general bias The bias shown by the actual host @Andre` is quite cauliflower. He also welcomes bias and freely talked about it earlier; he said to me on teamspeak that "if eop was in this position he wouldn't be open to fighting it right now, he'd straight up DQ them due to EOP "not showing respect to him".
unprofessionalism it seems that nobody actually knows how to run a simple fucking tournament judging by Slushpuppy's idea of the 50v50's. The seeds were drawn for CP vs FOE and EOP vs TLP yet slush wishes to dictate the matches be FOE vs TLP and EOP vs CP - what is the point of random seeding if you are going to dictate the matches? 
Another point would be BW are allowed to multi-clan with RD but when it comes to Panda, they weren't allowed to fight for both TLP and Panda. bias again.
 
Overall, this is fucking cauliflower & i am requesting a new host for the next tournament or any future Sharkbrew events cos the current host has a fucking minuscule brain.
 
 
23:29:04 | <[TLP]TESCO> like 23:29:06 | <[TLP]TESCO> cmon u know its bullbrown sticky stuff l 23:29:13 | <[TLP]TESCO> none of them even pmed us all day to mini 23:29:17 | <[TLP]TESCO> so hows that fair they get the win? 23:29:34 | <[Andre]> listen , from the mediators stand point 23:29:35 | <[Andre]> tlp has 2 more mins 23:29:36 | <[Andre]> to get 10   [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: You were going to get the loss if you didn't fight right then and there. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: all the mediators said it. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: So.

Just a few points I wanted some information on about the legitimacy of this cauliflower ass tournament hosted by @Andre`
 
scheduling / default times? No default times or dates were set if the matches didn't happen before the time period in which all clans had to complete their minis. TLP asked RD every day / most hours each day to mini RD for the 10v10 but when RD goes running to the host 20 minutes before the time runs out (supposedly after waiting up into the night for GMT and not even querying TLP for the 10v10) they asked for TLP to forfeit since we "refused" to do the war. We were then told we have 2 minutes to mass up and fight with whatever we can even if we pull less than 10, because the judges would rule in RD's favour even though RD tactically planned out to forfeit TLP. From this point, @Andre` pressured TLP into doing a 10v10 with literally anybody they could find - even inactive members who don't even like to P2P. Bottom line is regulations weren't in place for the tournament nor was any room for compromise - we were told fight or forfeit even though RD avoided us the first two days.
free passes Nobody can deny that FOE have a lot of free passes to finals and semi-finals of the 30v30 / 50v50 fights vs TLP/EOP with no actual reasoning in place. The host of this tournament is also hosted by a FOE member. Coincidence? 
general bias The bias shown by the actual host @Andre` is quite cauliflower. He also welcomes bias and freely talked about it earlier; he said to me on teamspeak that "if eop was in this position he wouldn't be open to fighting it right now, he'd straight up DQ them due to EOP "not showing respect to him".
unprofessionalism it seems that nobody actually knows how to run a simple fucking tournament judging by Slushpuppy's idea of the 50v50's. The seeds were drawn for CP vs FOE and EOP vs TLP yet slush wishes to dictate the matches be FOE vs TLP and EOP vs CP - what is the point of random seeding if you are going to dictate the matches? 
Another point would be BW are allowed to multi-clan with RD but when it comes to Panda, they weren't allowed to fight for both TLP and Panda. bias again.
 
Overall, this is fucking cauliflower & i am requesting a new host for the next tournament or any future Sharkbrew events cos the current host has a fucking minuscule brain.
 
 
23:29:04 | <[TLP]TESCO> like 23:29:06 | <[TLP]TESCO> cmon u know its bullbrown sticky stuff l 23:29:13 | <[TLP]TESCO> none of them even pmed us all day to mini 23:29:17 | <[TLP]TESCO> so hows that fair they get the win? 23:29:34 | <[Andre]> listen , from the mediators stand point 23:29:35 | <[Andre]> tlp has 2 more mins 23:29:36 | <[Andre]> to get 10   [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: You were going to get the loss if you didn't fight right then and there. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: all the mediators said it. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: So.

Just a few points I wanted some information on about the legitimacy of this cauliflower ass tournament hosted by @Andre`
 
scheduling / default times? No default times or dates were set if the matches didn't happen before the time period in which all clans had to complete their minis. TLP asked RD every day / most hours each day to mini RD for the 10v10 but when RD goes running to the host 20 minutes before the time runs out (supposedly after waiting up into the night for GMT and not even querying TLP for the 10v10) they asked for TLP to forfeit since we "refused" to do the war. We were then told we have 2 minutes to mass up and fight with whatever we can even if we pull less than 10, because the judges would rule in RD's favour even though RD tactically planned out to forfeit TLP. From this point, @Andre` pressured TLP into doing a 10v10 with literally anybody they could find - even inactive members who don't even like to P2P. Bottom line is regulations weren't in place for the tournament nor was any room for compromise - we were told fight or forfeit even though RD avoided us the first two days.
free passes Nobody can deny that FOE have a lot of free passes to finals and semi-finals of the 30v30 / 50v50 fights vs TLP/EOP with no actual reasoning in place. The host of this tournament is also hosted by a FOE member. Coincidence? 
general bias The bias shown by the actual host @Andre` is quite cauliflower. He also welcomes bias and freely talked about it earlier; he said to me on teamspeak that "if eop was in this position he wouldn't be open to fighting it right now, he'd straight up DQ them due to EOP "not showing respect to him".
unprofessionalism it seems that nobody actually knows how to run a simple fucking tournament judging by Slushpuppy's idea of the 50v50's. The seeds were drawn for CP vs FOE and EOP vs TLP yet slush wishes to dictate the matches be FOE vs TLP and EOP vs CP - what is the point of random seeding if you are going to dictate the matches? 
Another point would be BW are allowed to multi-clan with RD but when it comes to Panda, they weren't allowed to fight for both TLP and Panda. bias again.
 
Overall, this is fucking cauliflower & i am requesting a new host for the next tournament or any future Sharkbrew events cos the current host has a fucking minuscule brain.
 
 
23:29:04 | <[TLP]TESCO> like 23:29:06 | <[TLP]TESCO> cmon u know its bullbrown sticky stuff l 23:29:13 | <[TLP]TESCO> none of them even pmed us all day to mini 23:29:17 | <[TLP]TESCO> so hows that fair they get the win? 23:29:34 | <[Andre]> listen , from the mediators stand point 23:29:35 | <[Andre]> tlp has 2 more mins 23:29:36 | <[Andre]> to get 10   [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: You were going to get the loss if you didn't fight right then and there. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: all the mediators said it. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: So.

Just a few points I wanted some information on about the legitimacy of this cauliflower ass tournament hosted by @Andre`
 
scheduling / default times? No default times or dates were set if the matches didn't happen before the time period in which all clans had to complete their minis. TLP asked RD every day / most hours each day to mini RD for the 10v10 but when RD goes running to the host 20 minutes before the time runs out (supposedly after waiting up into the night for GMT and not even querying TLP for the 10v10) they asked for TLP to forfeit since we "refused" to do the war. We were then told we have 2 minutes to mass up and fight with whatever we can even if we pull less than 10, because the judges would rule in RD's favour even though RD tactically planned out to forfeit TLP. From this point, @Andre` pressured TLP into doing a 10v10 with literally anybody they could find - even inactive members who don't even like to P2P. Bottom line is regulations weren't in place for the tournament nor was any room for compromise - we were told fight or forfeit even though RD avoided us the first two days.
free passes Nobody can deny that FOE have a lot of free passes to finals and semi-finals of the 30v30 / 50v50 fights vs TLP/EOP with no actual reasoning in place. The host of this tournament is also hosted by a FOE member. Coincidence? 
general bias The bias shown by the actual host @Andre` is quite cauliflower. He also welcomes bias and freely talked about it earlier; he said to me on teamspeak that "if eop was in this position he wouldn't be open to fighting it right now, he'd straight up DQ them due to EOP "not showing respect to him".
unprofessionalism it seems that nobody actually knows how to run a simple fucking tournament judging by Slushpuppy's idea of the 50v50's. The seeds were drawn for CP vs FOE and EOP vs TLP yet slush wishes to dictate the matches be FOE vs TLP and EOP vs CP - what is the point of random seeding if you are going to dictate the matches? 
Another point would be BW are allowed to multi-clan with RD but when it comes to Panda, they weren't allowed to fight for both TLP and Panda. bias again.
 
Overall, this is fucking cauliflower & i am requesting a new host for the next tournament or any future Sharkbrew events cos the current host has a fucking minuscule brain.
 
 
23:29:04 | <[TLP]TESCO> like 23:29:06 | <[TLP]TESCO> cmon u know its bullbrown sticky stuff l 23:29:13 | <[TLP]TESCO> none of them even pmed us all day to mini 23:29:17 | <[TLP]TESCO> so hows that fair they get the win? 23:29:34 | <[Andre]> listen , from the mediators stand point 23:29:35 | <[Andre]> tlp has 2 more mins 23:29:36 | <[Andre]> to get 10   [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: You were going to get the loss if you didn't fight right then and there. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: all the mediators said it. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: So.

Just a few points I wanted some information on about the legitimacy of this cauliflower ass tournament hosted by @Andre`
 
scheduling / default times? No default times or dates were set if the matches didn't happen before the time period in which all clans had to complete their minis. TLP asked RD every day / most hours each day to mini RD for the 10v10 but when RD goes running to the host 20 minutes before the time runs out (supposedly after waiting up into the night for GMT and not even querying TLP for the 10v10) they asked for TLP to forfeit since we "refused" to do the war. We were then told we have 2 minutes to mass up and fight with whatever we can even if we pull less than 10, because the judges would rule in RD's favour even though RD tactically planned out to forfeit TLP. From this point, @Andre` pressured TLP into doing a 10v10 with literally anybody they could find - even inactive members who don't even like to P2P. Bottom line is regulations weren't in place for the tournament nor was any room for compromise - we were told fight or forfeit even though RD avoided us the first two days.
free passes Nobody can deny that FOE have a lot of free passes to finals and semi-finals of the 30v30 / 50v50 fights vs TLP/EOP with no actual reasoning in place. The host of this tournament is also hosted by a FOE member. Coincidence? 
general bias The bias shown by the actual host @Andre` is quite cauliflower. He also welcomes bias and freely talked about it earlier; he said to me on teamspeak that "if eop was in this position he wouldn't be open to fighting it right now, he'd straight up DQ them due to EOP "not showing respect to him".
unprofessionalism it seems that nobody actually knows how to run a simple fucking tournament judging by Slushpuppy's idea of the 50v50's. The seeds were drawn for CP vs FOE and EOP vs TLP yet slush wishes to dictate the matches be FOE vs TLP and EOP vs CP - what is the point of random seeding if you are going to dictate the matches? 
Another point would be BW are allowed to multi-clan with RD but when it comes to Panda, they weren't allowed to fight for both TLP and Panda. bias again.
 
Overall, this is fucking cauliflower & i am requesting a new host for the next tournament or any future Sharkbrew events cos the current host has a fucking minuscule brain.
 
 
23:29:04 | <[TLP]TESCO> like 23:29:06 | <[TLP]TESCO> cmon u know its bullbrown sticky stuff l 23:29:13 | <[TLP]TESCO> none of them even pmed us all day to mini 23:29:17 | <[TLP]TESCO> so hows that fair they get the win? 23:29:34 | <[Andre]> listen , from the mediators stand point 23:29:35 | <[Andre]> tlp has 2 more mins 23:29:36 | <[Andre]> to get 10   [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: You were going to get the loss if you didn't fight right then and there. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: all the mediators said it. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: So.

Just a few points I wanted some information on about the legitimacy of this cauliflower ass tournament hosted by @Andre`
 
scheduling / default times? No default times or dates were set if the matches didn't happen before the time period in which all clans had to complete their minis. TLP asked RD every day / most hours each day to mini RD for the 10v10 but when RD goes running to the host 20 minutes before the time runs out (supposedly after waiting up into the night for GMT and not even querying TLP for the 10v10) they asked for TLP to forfeit since we "refused" to do the war. We were then told we have 2 minutes to mass up and fight with whatever we can even if we pull less than 10, because the judges would rule in RD's favour even though RD tactically planned out to forfeit TLP. From this point, @Andre` pressured TLP into doing a 10v10 with literally anybody they could find - even inactive members who don't even like to P2P. Bottom line is regulations weren't in place for the tournament nor was any room for compromise - we were told fight or forfeit even though RD avoided us the first two days.
free passes Nobody can deny that FOE have a lot of free passes to finals and semi-finals of the 30v30 / 50v50 fights vs TLP/EOP with no actual reasoning in place. The host of this tournament is also hosted by a FOE member. Coincidence? 
general bias The bias shown by the actual host @Andre` is quite cauliflower. He also welcomes bias and freely talked about it earlier; he said to me on teamspeak that "if eop was in this position he wouldn't be open to fighting it right now, he'd straight up DQ them due to EOP "not showing respect to him".
unprofessionalism it seems that nobody actually knows how to run a simple fucking tournament judging by Slushpuppy's idea of the 50v50's. The seeds were drawn for CP vs FOE and EOP vs TLP yet slush wishes to dictate the matches be FOE vs TLP and EOP vs CP - what is the point of random seeding if you are going to dictate the matches? 
Another point would be BW are allowed to multi-clan with RD but when it comes to Panda, they weren't allowed to fight for both TLP and Panda. bias again.
 
Overall, this is fucking cauliflower & i am requesting a new host for the next tournament or any future Sharkbrew events cos the current host has a fucking minuscule brain.
 
 
23:29:04 | <[TLP]TESCO> like 23:29:06 | <[TLP]TESCO> cmon u know its bullbrown sticky stuff l 23:29:13 | <[TLP]TESCO> none of them even pmed us all day to mini 23:29:17 | <[TLP]TESCO> so hows that fair they get the win? 23:29:34 | <[Andre]> listen , from the mediators stand point 23:29:35 | <[Andre]> tlp has 2 more mins 23:29:36 | <[Andre]> to get 10   [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: You were going to get the loss if you didn't fight right then and there. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: all the mediators said it. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: So.

Mayhem won't sign up for the ladder either to avoid being declared on hehehe

help i got alzheimer&#39;s

Oh? So you was just attempting to run a brown sticky stuff tourney in the first place, thanks for clarifying 

This is about the tournament, and I won't bother to privately lynch him after how he publicly mistreats people over their legitimate concerns with the tournament. As a rank and a host of the tournament, insulting and baiting people who inquire about the tournament grants you no respect. 
 
Don't be annoyed at me when a supposed unbiased host is getting involved with the politics and taking sides :^P My professional opinion would be to redo with a time that both clans agree on or can be prepared for, rather than forcing one clan to fight right away and unprepared. 

The host of events should be showing professionalism and not bias. Being a part of one of the competing clans, the treatment received from the host and explanations for the selectivity of pools and rules (excessive byes/straight finals for specific clans/exceptions and minimal clarity to rules) has been crude and unprofessional.
 
If people are to be happy with the running of the tournament, the runner of the tournament shouldn't be hostile/show bias towards the people competing.
 
The whole concept of the tournament is great, but the execution has been piss poor and it's only been the 10v10s so far lol. The condemning of Andre is justified, and not disgusting behaviour. The tournament is for the community, not Andre.
 
Edit: andre has been approached by people who have concerns about how poorly things have been run, either 'trolls' (foe being given automatic running to finals due to winning the jcup) or unfair ultimatums are handed back.
 
 
How fair is being ignored for 2 days while trying to mini their opponent, and then being forced out of the blue to mini in a couple minutes or be dq'd?

Wheres my callout?

Just a few points I wanted some information on about the legitimacy of this cauliflower ass tournament hosted by @Andre`
 
scheduling / default times? No default times or dates were set if the matches didn't happen before the time period in which all clans had to complete their minis. TLP asked RD every day / most hours each day to mini RD for the 10v10 but when RD goes running to the host 20 minutes before the time runs out (supposedly after waiting up into the night for GMT and not even querying TLP for the 10v10) they asked for TLP to forfeit since we "refused" to do the war. We were then told we have 2 minutes to mass up and fight with whatever we can even if we pull less than 10, because the judges would rule in RD's favour even though RD tactically planned out to forfeit TLP. From this point, @Andre` pressured TLP into doing a 10v10 with literally anybody they could find - even inactive members who don't even like to P2P. Bottom line is regulations weren't in place for the tournament nor was any room for compromise - we were told fight or forfeit even though RD avoided us the first two days.
free passes Nobody can deny that FOE have a lot of free passes to finals and semi-finals of the 30v30 / 50v50 fights vs TLP/EOP with no actual reasoning in place. The host of this tournament is also hosted by a FOE member. Coincidence? 
general bias The bias shown by the actual host @Andre` is quite cauliflower. He also welcomes bias and freely talked about it earlier; he said to me on teamspeak that "if eop was in this position he wouldn't be open to fighting it right now, he'd straight up DQ them due to EOP "not showing respect to him".
unprofessionalism it seems that nobody actually knows how to run a simple fucking tournament judging by Slushpuppy's idea of the 50v50's. The seeds were drawn for CP vs FOE and EOP vs TLP yet slush wishes to dictate the matches be FOE vs TLP and EOP vs CP - what is the point of random seeding if you are going to dictate the matches? 
Another point would be BW are allowed to multi-clan with RD but when it comes to Panda, they weren't allowed to fight for both TLP and Panda. bias again.
 
Overall, this is fucking cauliflower & i am requesting a new host for the next tournament or any future Sharkbrew events cos the current host has a fucking minuscule brain.
 
 
23:29:04 | <[TLP]TESCO> like 23:29:06 | <[TLP]TESCO> cmon u know its bullbrown sticky stuff l 23:29:13 | <[TLP]TESCO> none of them even pmed us all day to mini 23:29:17 | <[TLP]TESCO> so hows that fair they get the win? 23:29:34 | <[Andre]> listen , from the mediators stand point 23:29:35 | <[Andre]> tlp has 2 more mins 23:29:36 | <[Andre]> to get 10   [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: You were going to get the loss if you didn't fight right then and there. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: all the mediators said it. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: So.

Just a few points I wanted some information on about the legitimacy of this cauliflower ass tournament hosted by @Andre`
 
scheduling / default times? No default times or dates were set if the matches didn't happen before the time period in which all clans had to complete their minis. TLP asked RD every day / most hours each day to mini RD for the 10v10 but when RD goes running to the host 20 minutes before the time runs out (supposedly after waiting up into the night for GMT and not even querying TLP for the 10v10) they asked for TLP to forfeit since we "refused" to do the war. We were then told we have 2 minutes to mass up and fight with whatever we can even if we pull less than 10, because the judges would rule in RD's favour even though RD tactically planned out to forfeit TLP. From this point, @Andre` pressured TLP into doing a 10v10 with literally anybody they could find - even inactive members who don't even like to P2P. Bottom line is regulations weren't in place for the tournament nor was any room for compromise - we were told fight or forfeit even though RD avoided us the first two days.
free passes Nobody can deny that FOE have a lot of free passes to finals and semi-finals of the 30v30 / 50v50 fights vs TLP/EOP with no actual reasoning in place. The host of this tournament is also hosted by a FOE member. Coincidence? 
general bias The bias shown by the actual host @Andre` is quite cauliflower. He also welcomes bias and freely talked about it earlier; he said to me on teamspeak that "if eop was in this position he wouldn't be open to fighting it right now, he'd straight up DQ them due to EOP "not showing respect to him".
unprofessionalism it seems that nobody actually knows how to run a simple fucking tournament judging by Slushpuppy's idea of the 50v50's. The seeds were drawn for CP vs FOE and EOP vs TLP yet slush wishes to dictate the matches be FOE vs TLP and EOP vs CP - what is the point of random seeding if you are going to dictate the matches? 
Another point would be BW are allowed to multi-clan with RD but when it comes to Panda, they weren't allowed to fight for both TLP and Panda. bias again.
 
Overall, this is fucking cauliflower & i am requesting a new host for the next tournament or any future Sharkbrew events cos the current host has a fucking minuscule brain.
 
 
23:29:04 | <[TLP]TESCO> like 23:29:06 | <[TLP]TESCO> cmon u know its bullbrown sticky stuff l 23:29:13 | <[TLP]TESCO> none of them even pmed us all day to mini 23:29:17 | <[TLP]TESCO> so hows that fair they get the win? 23:29:34 | <[Andre]> listen , from the mediators stand point 23:29:35 | <[Andre]> tlp has 2 more mins 23:29:36 | <[Andre]> to get 10   [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: You were going to get the loss if you didn't fight right then and there. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: all the mediators said it. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: So.

Just a few points I wanted some information on about the legitimacy of this cauliflower ass tournament hosted by @Andre`
 
scheduling / default times? No default times or dates were set if the matches didn't happen before the time period in which all clans had to complete their minis. TLP asked RD every day / most hours each day to mini RD for the 10v10 but when RD goes running to the host 20 minutes before the time runs out (supposedly after waiting up into the night for GMT and not even querying TLP for the 10v10) they asked for TLP to forfeit since we "refused" to do the war. We were then told we have 2 minutes to mass up and fight with whatever we can even if we pull less than 10, because the judges would rule in RD's favour even though RD tactically planned out to forfeit TLP. From this point, @Andre` pressured TLP into doing a 10v10 with literally anybody they could find - even inactive members who don't even like to P2P. Bottom line is regulations weren't in place for the tournament nor was any room for compromise - we were told fight or forfeit even though RD avoided us the first two days.
free passes Nobody can deny that FOE have a lot of free passes to finals and semi-finals of the 30v30 / 50v50 fights vs TLP/EOP with no actual reasoning in place. The host of this tournament is also hosted by a FOE member. Coincidence? 
general bias The bias shown by the actual host @Andre` is quite cauliflower. He also welcomes bias and freely talked about it earlier; he said to me on teamspeak that "if eop was in this position he wouldn't be open to fighting it right now, he'd straight up DQ them due to EOP "not showing respect to him".
unprofessionalism it seems that nobody actually knows how to run a simple fucking tournament judging by Slushpuppy's idea of the 50v50's. The seeds were drawn for CP vs FOE and EOP vs TLP yet slush wishes to dictate the matches be FOE vs TLP and EOP vs CP - what is the point of random seeding if you are going to dictate the matches? 
Another point would be BW are allowed to multi-clan with RD but when it comes to Panda, they weren't allowed to fight for both TLP and Panda. bias again.
 
Overall, this is fucking cauliflower & i am requesting a new host for the next tournament or any future Sharkbrew events cos the current host has a fucking minuscule brain.
 
 
23:29:04 | <[TLP]TESCO> like 23:29:06 | <[TLP]TESCO> cmon u know its bullbrown sticky stuff l 23:29:13 | <[TLP]TESCO> none of them even pmed us all day to mini 23:29:17 | <[TLP]TESCO> so hows that fair they get the win? 23:29:34 | <[Andre]> listen , from the mediators stand point 23:29:35 | <[Andre]> tlp has 2 more mins 23:29:36 | <[Andre]> to get 10   [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: You were going to get the loss if you didn't fight right then and there. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: all the mediators said it. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: So.

Just a few points I wanted some information on about the legitimacy of this cauliflower ass tournament hosted by @Andre`
 
scheduling / default times? No default times or dates were set if the matches didn't happen before the time period in which all clans had to complete their minis. TLP asked RD every day / most hours each day to mini RD for the 10v10 but when RD goes running to the host 20 minutes before the time runs out (supposedly after waiting up into the night for GMT and not even querying TLP for the 10v10) they asked for TLP to forfeit since we "refused" to do the war. We were then told we have 2 minutes to mass up and fight with whatever we can even if we pull less than 10, because the judges would rule in RD's favour even though RD tactically planned out to forfeit TLP. From this point, @Andre` pressured TLP into doing a 10v10 with literally anybody they could find - even inactive members who don't even like to P2P. Bottom line is regulations weren't in place for the tournament nor was any room for compromise - we were told fight or forfeit even though RD avoided us the first two days.
free passes Nobody can deny that FOE have a lot of free passes to finals and semi-finals of the 30v30 / 50v50 fights vs TLP/EOP with no actual reasoning in place. The host of this tournament is also hosted by a FOE member. Coincidence? 
general bias The bias shown by the actual host @Andre` is quite cauliflower. He also welcomes bias and freely talked about it earlier; he said to me on teamspeak that "if eop was in this position he wouldn't be open to fighting it right now, he'd straight up DQ them due to EOP "not showing respect to him".
unprofessionalism it seems that nobody actually knows how to run a simple fucking tournament judging by Slushpuppy's idea of the 50v50's. The seeds were drawn for CP vs FOE and EOP vs TLP yet slush wishes to dictate the matches be FOE vs TLP and EOP vs CP - what is the point of random seeding if you are going to dictate the matches? 
Another point would be BW are allowed to multi-clan with RD but when it comes to Panda, they weren't allowed to fight for both TLP and Panda. bias again.
 
Overall, this is fucking cauliflower & i am requesting a new host for the next tournament or any future Sharkbrew events cos the current host has a fucking minuscule brain.
 
 
23:29:04 | <[TLP]TESCO> like 23:29:06 | <[TLP]TESCO> cmon u know its bullbrown sticky stuff l 23:29:13 | <[TLP]TESCO> none of them even pmed us all day to mini 23:29:17 | <[TLP]TESCO> so hows that fair they get the win? 23:29:34 | <[Andre]> listen , from the mediators stand point 23:29:35 | <[Andre]> tlp has 2 more mins 23:29:36 | <[Andre]> to get 10   [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: You were going to get the loss if you didn't fight right then and there. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: all the mediators said it. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: So.

Just a few points I wanted some information on about the legitimacy of this cauliflower ass tournament hosted by @Andre`
 
scheduling / default times? No default times or dates were set if the matches didn't happen before the time period in which all clans had to complete their minis. TLP asked RD every day / most hours each day to mini RD for the 10v10 but when RD goes running to the host 20 minutes before the time runs out (supposedly after waiting up into the night for GMT and not even querying TLP for the 10v10) they asked for TLP to forfeit since we "refused" to do the war. We were then told we have 2 minutes to mass up and fight with whatever we can even if we pull less than 10, because the judges would rule in RD's favour even though RD tactically planned out to forfeit TLP. From this point, @Andre` pressured TLP into doing a 10v10 with literally anybody they could find - even inactive members who don't even like to P2P. Bottom line is regulations weren't in place for the tournament nor was any room for compromise - we were told fight or forfeit even though RD avoided us the first two days.
free passes Nobody can deny that FOE have a lot of free passes to finals and semi-finals of the 30v30 / 50v50 fights vs TLP/EOP with no actual reasoning in place. The host of this tournament is also hosted by a FOE member. Coincidence? 
general bias The bias shown by the actual host @Andre` is quite cauliflower. He also welcomes bias and freely talked about it earlier; he said to me on teamspeak that "if eop was in this position he wouldn't be open to fighting it right now, he'd straight up DQ them due to EOP "not showing respect to him".
unprofessionalism it seems that nobody actually knows how to run a simple fucking tournament judging by Slushpuppy's idea of the 50v50's. The seeds were drawn for CP vs FOE and EOP vs TLP yet slush wishes to dictate the matches be FOE vs TLP and EOP vs CP - what is the point of random seeding if you are going to dictate the matches? 
Another point would be BW are allowed to multi-clan with RD but when it comes to Panda, they weren't allowed to fight for both TLP and Panda. bias again.
 
Overall, this is fucking cauliflower & i am requesting a new host for the next tournament or any future Sharkbrew events cos the current host has a fucking minuscule brain.
 
 
23:29:04 | <[TLP]TESCO> like 23:29:06 | <[TLP]TESCO> cmon u know its bullbrown sticky stuff l 23:29:13 | <[TLP]TESCO> none of them even pmed us all day to mini 23:29:17 | <[TLP]TESCO> so hows that fair they get the win? 23:29:34 | <[Andre]> listen , from the mediators stand point 23:29:35 | <[Andre]> tlp has 2 more mins 23:29:36 | <[Andre]> to get 10   [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: You were going to get the loss if you didn't fight right then and there. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: all the mediators said it. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: So.

Just a few points I wanted some information on about the legitimacy of this cauliflower ass tournament hosted by @Andre`
 
scheduling / default times? No default times or dates were set if the matches didn't happen before the time period in which all clans had to complete their minis. TLP asked RD every day / most hours each day to mini RD for the 10v10 but when RD goes running to the host 20 minutes before the time runs out (supposedly after waiting up into the night for GMT and not even querying TLP for the 10v10) they asked for TLP to forfeit since we "refused" to do the war. We were then told we have 2 minutes to mass up and fight with whatever we can even if we pull less than 10, because the judges would rule in RD's favour even though RD tactically planned out to forfeit TLP. From this point, @Andre` pressured TLP into doing a 10v10 with literally anybody they could find - even inactive members who don't even like to P2P. Bottom line is regulations weren't in place for the tournament nor was any room for compromise - we were told fight or forfeit even though RD avoided us the first two days.
free passes Nobody can deny that FOE have a lot of free passes to finals and semi-finals of the 30v30 / 50v50 fights vs TLP/EOP with no actual reasoning in place. The host of this tournament is also hosted by a FOE member. Coincidence? 
general bias The bias shown by the actual host @Andre` is quite cauliflower. He also welcomes bias and freely talked about it earlier; he said to me on teamspeak that "if eop was in this position he wouldn't be open to fighting it right now, he'd straight up DQ them due to EOP "not showing respect to him".
unprofessionalism it seems that nobody actually knows how to run a simple fucking tournament judging by Slushpuppy's idea of the 50v50's. The seeds were drawn for CP vs FOE and EOP vs TLP yet slush wishes to dictate the matches be FOE vs TLP and EOP vs CP - what is the point of random seeding if you are going to dictate the matches? 
Another point would be BW are allowed to multi-clan with RD but when it comes to Panda, they weren't allowed to fight for both TLP and Panda. bias again.
 
Overall, this is fucking cauliflower & i am requesting a new host for the next tournament or any future Sharkbrew events cos the current host has a fucking minuscule brain.
 
 
23:29:04 | <[TLP]TESCO> like 23:29:06 | <[TLP]TESCO> cmon u know its bullbrown sticky stuff l 23:29:13 | <[TLP]TESCO> none of them even pmed us all day to mini 23:29:17 | <[TLP]TESCO> so hows that fair they get the win? 23:29:34 | <[Andre]> listen , from the mediators stand point 23:29:35 | <[Andre]> tlp has 2 more mins 23:29:36 | <[Andre]> to get 10   [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: You were going to get the loss if you didn't fight right then and there. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: all the mediators said it. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: So.

Just a few points I wanted some information on about the legitimacy of this cauliflower ass tournament hosted by @Andre`
 
scheduling / default times? No default times or dates were set if the matches didn't happen before the time period in which all clans had to complete their minis. TLP asked RD every day / most hours each day to mini RD for the 10v10 but when RD goes running to the host 20 minutes before the time runs out (supposedly after waiting up into the night for GMT and not even querying TLP for the 10v10) they asked for TLP to forfeit since we "refused" to do the war. We were then told we have 2 minutes to mass up and fight with whatever we can even if we pull less than 10, because the judges would rule in RD's favour even though RD tactically planned out to forfeit TLP. From this point, @Andre` pressured TLP into doing a 10v10 with literally anybody they could find - even inactive members who don't even like to P2P. Bottom line is regulations weren't in place for the tournament nor was any room for compromise - we were told fight or forfeit even though RD avoided us the first two days.
free passes Nobody can deny that FOE have a lot of free passes to finals and semi-finals of the 30v30 / 50v50 fights vs TLP/EOP with no actual reasoning in place. The host of this tournament is also hosted by a FOE member. Coincidence? 
general bias The bias shown by the actual host @Andre` is quite cauliflower. He also welcomes bias and freely talked about it earlier; he said to me on teamspeak that "if eop was in this position he wouldn't be open to fighting it right now, he'd straight up DQ them due to EOP "not showing respect to him".
unprofessionalism it seems that nobody actually knows how to run a simple fucking tournament judging by Slushpuppy's idea of the 50v50's. The seeds were drawn for CP vs FOE and EOP vs TLP yet slush wishes to dictate the matches be FOE vs TLP and EOP vs CP - what is the point of random seeding if you are going to dictate the matches? 
Another point would be BW are allowed to multi-clan with RD but when it comes to Panda, they weren't allowed to fight for both TLP and Panda. bias again.
 
Overall, this is fucking cauliflower & i am requesting a new host for the next tournament or any future Sharkbrew events cos the current host has a fucking minuscule brain.
 
 
23:29:04 | <[TLP]TESCO> like 23:29:06 | <[TLP]TESCO> cmon u know its bullbrown sticky stuff l 23:29:13 | <[TLP]TESCO> none of them even pmed us all day to mini 23:29:17 | <[TLP]TESCO> so hows that fair they get the win? 23:29:34 | <[Andre]> listen , from the mediators stand point 23:29:35 | <[Andre]> tlp has 2 more mins 23:29:36 | <[Andre]> to get 10   [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: You were going to get the loss if you didn't fight right then and there. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: all the mediators said it. [11:13pm] Range_Grudge: [11:12pm] [Andre]: So.