Jump to content

Kim

Overseer
  • Posts

    5593
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by Kim

  1. You are not the first one to suggest to have a PCL over the weekend. Its not a bad suggestion to make. I only worry about what type of impact that can cause for the other clans. You do make mention of becoming a splinter, but I feel as the community is a stuck in a forever position in between these clans unless every leadership agrees to something.. Another problem that I will create a topic about later this week, prep starvation has worsen within the last year. Although, the clans who had their pulls decrease may not find it as a problem to do a PCL concept over the weekend. The clans who are being starved of action have been accused of calling the main clans/bringing mains of their own. Those clans who are being accused have made claims that the accusers are scared of taking losses. Its a difficult situation for the pure community as both sides don't seem to want any fixes or come together to find some sort of solution.
  2.  

    two of the categories are tied & the poll itself has almost hit 100 votes. Feel free to look over the topic~ 

  3.  

    getting near 100 votes if anyone wants to check the topic out/vote 

  4. they have to watch the video to see if the mains are always in the same fights/spamming along/following calls
  5. the logos overall are really nice. I like the emojis especially. the discord logo itself, i wish it was as cute as the emojis
  6.  vote when y'all have time. its nearing a hundred soon 

  7. I will hide comments that have nothing to do with this topic and only serve to bait people. Bait people in your respective aftermath topics.
  8. Glad to see that you're still sticking to your guns on this topic. I reviewed my old topic on this subject and saw that you said something similar.
  9. The only thing I could add to your comment, I think its pretty disgusting how Jagex profits off the PvP community through DMM. They are looking to start back up again. The only time we are not ignored its for their benefit.
  10. Had to make it "long" to narrow on people's perspectives,
  11. In terms of getting them to prep you guys, the best thing I could suggest is to talk to Pillow or Jimmy. I do recall Supremacy giving Rage an event before I retired in August. But, the best language that can be used with any one who may not dislike Rage is try to come to common ground. Not "we will off you with main for exchange of a prep." At least, that's how it came off to me and why I said it was a demand. It also doesn't help that keefn who was a big part of the beef at some point laughed at my comment earlier(not sure if he has any say now since idk anything about rage leadership atm.) In terms of clanning starvation beforehand, I agree with you. In my opinion, it goes back to people not being to compete with clans of their same tier. It is a lot more to lose. Its also as Moun said, if they risk it, they may be able to win and get much more hype for their clan. I believe another person on my previous topic mentioned, it doesn't help that clans will flame after a loss.
  12. I have discussed a lot of these points within the last topic. But, I do appreciate you providing feedback, the cost of ego's within pure leaderships has been shocking. In factors of sharing mains, cwa performance, and the latter.
  13. Going from your first comment, the only reason why I decided to create these two topics was to stimulate discussion between clan members that may not see different perspectives. A lot of leaderships lie to their memberbase about causes and effects. I do agree with you, that the problem stems from leaderships allowing for this to get too far and not denouncing a lot of the nh. (main usage, ragging, doxxing, etc.) I do believe withint the first topic about two or three people did shame leaderships but they weren't active clan members in this current time. You are not wrong to state these things. I appreciate your time in providing your feedback.
  14. Not sure if your sentence being capitalized is a way of you portraying sarcasm. But, for those who may read this topic. Sharkbrew has asked Jagex before for defence capped worlds, they didn't quite understand it & thought it would kill pvp. But, I do believe if this community could demonstrate some sort of solidarity and unite for the demand, they would consider it further other than just saying no off the bat.
  15. Here is to hoping that you're not a rank within rage. As a former rank of Supremacy, I can 100% tell you that Rage was bringing mains onto Supremacy as a "joke" "banter" for no reason at times when we were scouting out fights or just at graves. (This is when Rage were going against FOE.) Supremacy leadership aka 3at/Pillow would most likely need Rage to sit down with them and have some sort of insurance. Other than that, they most likely won't trust you if only demands are made. Old core of Supremacy do not trust Rage and their leadership. So the insurance has to be made. The way you worded that sentence wouldn't get anywhere with any elders+leadership. Due to past disagreements and old beef. I don't see anything happening from FOE's side. I saw Apex's side being easier to communicate if Nox sees the benefit(if he is still the leader of Apex.) On discord, I discussed that the bit of team on crash. I don't see this happening if the communication between all clans is horrid or a pan of demands without any real insurance between both sides.
  16. Last week's topic: https://www.sharkbrew.com/community/index.php?/topic/56624-mains-within-the-pure-community/
×
×
  • Create New...