Trajan

If both end up declining it'll just be true testament to how corny and lame this shit has gotten with all the politics and lack of interesting shit going on
Best of luck all

(this pic isn't mine btw)
 

l00000000000000000000l we lost 6 in a round vs you in a 40v40

Dear Pure Community,

Back in the old days of pure clanning there used to be a Ranks by Warring (RAW) list that was used to promote wilderness fullouts (in this case it could be used for 40 vs 40 CW preps). The way it worked was simple:
All clans were placed on a numbered list for F2P, and a seperate one for P2P (#1 to #X depending on the amount of clans); Clans on the list could only declare on the clan right above them; If you beat the clan above you, your clan took their spot on the ranking list (rules were put in place to make sure you could not re-declare for X-amount of days); If a declaration was still ignored after X-amount of days, the clan that declared would take the spot of the clan that they declared upon; The list did not reset after X-amount of days, but I propose a reset if implemented (see poll). Besides two lists for CW (F2P and P2P), a seperate RAW list could be created for midweeks based on points.
Some questions:
Would you, as a member or rank of a clan, like to see the RAW system replace the current COTM system to promote competitive preps (see the poll)? If so, what kind of reward would you like to see, and when should the list reset (see the poll)? What should be the minimum amount of opts for planned fights? I personally would set it at 40 vs 40 max or matched below it. What fixed day(s) and times should be used for fights? Would you like a seperate RAW list for midweeks? Feel free to discuss this idea further in the comments. Ranks are encouraged to chat with@slushpuppyand each other regarding such a potential system.

Have a great day and stay safe!

This was easier
 
 

Friendly reminder for anyone suffering from short term memory loss

fo forfeiting when they're worried they might lose, I'm starting to see a pattern here. GJ BP

fo forfeiting when they're worried they might lose, I'm starting to see a pattern here. GJ BP

There's a lot of FOE members posting on this topic about how often they beat Rage and Rage is losing their core members. If it's that easy to win why not just show up and do it? It would've crushed Rage morale and been free hype. Hopefully someone can post an actual reason they skipped out on this because I'm pretty confused and disappointed tbh.
Hopefully FOE does have a reason, a bunch of 20+ year olds having egos so fragile they can't face a possible loss on a computer game is pretty sad. 

There's a lot of FOE members posting on this topic about how often they beat Rage and Rage is losing their core members. If it's that easy to win why not just show up and do it? It would've crushed Rage morale and been free hype. Hopefully someone can post an actual reason they skipped out on this because I'm pretty confused and disappointed tbh.
Hopefully FOE does have a reason, a bunch of 20+ year olds having egos so fragile they can't face a possible loss on a computer game is pretty sad. 

Op closed ruin btw never forget hehehehehehehe

Op closed ruin btw never forget hehehehehehehe

Op closed ruin btw never forget hehehehehehehe

There's a lot of FOE members posting on this topic about how often they beat Rage and Rage is losing their core members. If it's that easy to win why not just show up and do it? It would've crushed Rage morale and been free hype. Hopefully someone can post an actual reason they skipped out on this because I'm pretty confused and disappointed tbh.
Hopefully FOE does have a reason, a bunch of 20+ year olds having egos so fragile they can't face a possible loss on a computer game is pretty sad. 

There's a lot of FOE members posting on this topic about how often they beat Rage and Rage is losing their core members. If it's that easy to win why not just show up and do it? It would've crushed Rage morale and been free hype. Hopefully someone can post an actual reason they skipped out on this because I'm pretty confused and disappointed tbh.
Hopefully FOE does have a reason, a bunch of 20+ year olds having egos so fragile they can't face a possible loss on a computer game is pretty sad. 

There's a lot of FOE members posting on this topic about how often they beat Rage and Rage is losing their core members. If it's that easy to win why not just show up and do it? It would've crushed Rage morale and been free hype. Hopefully someone can post an actual reason they skipped out on this because I'm pretty confused and disappointed tbh.
Hopefully FOE does have a reason, a bunch of 20+ year olds having egos so fragile they can't face a possible loss on a computer game is pretty sad. 

There's a lot of FOE members posting on this topic about how often they beat Rage and Rage is losing their core members. If it's that easy to win why not just show up and do it? It would've crushed Rage morale and been free hype. Hopefully someone can post an actual reason they skipped out on this because I'm pretty confused and disappointed tbh.
Hopefully FOE does have a reason, a bunch of 20+ year olds having egos so fragile they can't face a possible loss on a computer game is pretty sad. 

There's a lot of FOE members posting on this topic about how often they beat Rage and Rage is losing their core members. If it's that easy to win why not just show up and do it? It would've crushed Rage morale and been free hype. Hopefully someone can post an actual reason they skipped out on this because I'm pretty confused and disappointed tbh.
Hopefully FOE does have a reason, a bunch of 20+ year olds having egos so fragile they can't face a possible loss on a computer game is pretty sad. 

There's a lot of FOE members posting on this topic about how often they beat Rage and Rage is losing their core members. If it's that easy to win why not just show up and do it? It would've crushed Rage morale and been free hype. Hopefully someone can post an actual reason they skipped out on this because I'm pretty confused and disappointed tbh.
Hopefully FOE does have a reason, a bunch of 20+ year olds having egos so fragile they can't face a possible loss on a computer game is pretty sad. 

There's a lot of FOE members posting on this topic about how often they beat Rage and Rage is losing their core members. If it's that easy to win why not just show up and do it? It would've crushed Rage morale and been free hype. Hopefully someone can post an actual reason they skipped out on this because I'm pretty confused and disappointed tbh.
Hopefully FOE does have a reason, a bunch of 20+ year olds having egos so fragile they can't face a possible loss on a computer game is pretty sad. 

There's a lot of FOE members posting on this topic about how often they beat Rage and Rage is losing their core members. If it's that easy to win why not just show up and do it? It would've crushed Rage morale and been free hype. Hopefully someone can post an actual reason they skipped out on this because I'm pretty confused and disappointed tbh.
Hopefully FOE does have a reason, a bunch of 20+ year olds having egos so fragile they can't face a possible loss on a computer game is pretty sad. 

You can talk shit on sharkbrew all you want, but we all know there's a reason your clan only wants to fight on weekends when you have +30 or on midweeks with SV/Fasan in your CC. Any talk of CWA/Matched fights and your clan cowers. This is twice now that sharkbrew had to force a prep time for a MAJOR event/tournament because your leadership refused to fight us. Anyone with a brain can put two and two together.
You priority numbers/spams/suicide returning (and ur not even the best at that, Zenith outpull u by 40), we prioritize quality and winning. That's why we have 2-4 prep wins a week and you touch clanwars once every few months only to die to apex (the only clan you cwa, for some reason).

wtf is that vid u just die over and over