There may appear to be some inconsistencies with how some topics/posts are dealt with throughout the experiences of SharkBrew eg; attempts at flaming or baiting specific clans and people who are involved with the particular clans dealing with it from their own clan's point of view rather than a neutral moderators' point of view.
A quick fix would be to not allow mediators or admins who are a part of a clan being baited to moderate how they feel is fit. So if there was a bait topic, say, "TLP sucks", a staff member like Braden wouldn't be required to moderate it as he may have a connection with the clan being targeted which could in theory cloud his judgement, so someone like Franco or Elver would step in and deal with it how they see fit. Although, if it's something that obviously shouldn't be there (memberboards, ips, irl information) then he would be in the clear to take the action deemed necessary.
The same would apply for personal insults or baits towards moderators such as this;
In order to keep a fair level of moderating, someone else with the mod powers would check over this to see if it is considered pointless/specifically targeting an individual.
This way, a clearer, seemingly less bias direction of moderating can continue to thrive!