Murd

That's another point, however you can't restrict them from having fun too, although they do need to remember they hold a position of authority and if they act like the trolls here, we will be sent back to the stone age aka clan warfare!@ But off Braden he's bae

Thanks for making it a little more clear. However one of the points I'm mentioning is that if you need to ask about the actions in the staff channel you should let someone else take action so you won't have the feel of 'bias modding' around. And to be fair this community does thrive around the banter and flaming so some of those topics may not need to be removed considering some of the others we still have floating around (although due to the title and intent that would have been a fair call).

There may appear to be some inconsistencies with how some topics/posts are dealt with throughout the experiences of SharkBrew eg; attempts at flaming or baiting specific clans and people who are involved with the particular clans dealing with it from their own clan's point of view rather than a neutral moderators' point of view. A quick fix would be to not allow mediators or admins who are a part of a clan being baited to moderate how they feel is fit. So if there was a bait topic, say, "TLP sucks", a staff member like Braden wouldn't be required to moderate it as he may have a connection with the clan being targeted which could in theory cloud his judgement, so someone like Franco or Elver would step in and deal with it how they see fit. Although, if it's something that obviously shouldn't be there (memberboards, ips, irl information) then he would be in the clear to take the action deemed necessary. The same would apply for personal insults or baits towards moderators such as this; In order to keep a fair level of moderating, someone else with the mod powers would check over this to see if it is considered pointless/specifically targeting an individual. This way, a clearer, seemingly less bias direction of moderating can continue to thrive!

That was sudden, fak

Ah yes good to see none of your callers were robbed irl today, would've sucked if you had to cancel two days in a row! Good job on the win

rekt

And by complaining in a format such as this (uneducated and emotional), you not only lose your credibility but you become the one thing you look like you're campaigning against which gives the audience here a good chuckle. tldr; It's the internet so who really gives two brown sticky stuffs about what other people do. Be concerned about your own life, don't try to influence others because you have a distaste for a particular thing that they may enjoy.

No real competition man, it's great to see this site lasting as long as it has and hopefully make it to many more anniversaries =]

An interesting tactic to make all of their 99 and under sit (and making it under 30v30 for the last round), I guess they forgot about the glorious 1 defence pure master race

You're the ones who cancelled though so you shouldn't try to justify it! If an advanced member in 2012 can win against eop in a fullout down 7 then I'm sure there shouldn't be a problem with one lil f2p prep against tlp... I mean you had a load of ranks on and preps are for practice, shouldn't put all your eggs in one basket and just let someone else take the helm like your glorious leader swelly (even if he has to sign/call ingame)

l0l I wouldn't have expected someone to schedule a prep when their callers aren't able to be on, seems suspicious

I'll sell all of them a rune set for 1m each anyday

Mods can't see what ips connect between accounts though!@

Gimme a smooch

Ooo is there a service to find out who every troll account is? @@slushpuppy we must discuss and expose all of these anonymous individuals and give them their respected names on these forums!

That's inaccurate when you take into account that these identities have been around sharkbrew since before these LPC's. I'm not saying that there are no "posers" from cd as there most likely are, but generally most clans have their own set of accounts to instigate drama, however it would most likely be a negative for the website to remove them all as they contribute a lot towards the website's activity. Although I do support the removal of some of the more obvious and mediocre posers from around the community

Good job on your win lads

Nice job

You're so sincere :')

Bullied from beyond the grave aha

I still feel bad for bullying disabled kids. Oh well, at least there isn't a tax for them to enter the wilderness anymore which I hope they take advantage of haha

People on troll accounts are on them for a reason, they can't handle being known!!!!

If it's originally for lpc's I don't see why people are asking for a 20 def cap. You'd just be advertising 20 def and next thing you know half the lpcs will have a 20 def movement which would bring along more 60s and 70s in mith '.'

I can count the amount of times we've closed on one hand, can you? slug...