Jump to content

Sandra

Member
  • Posts

    387
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sandra

  1. 3 hours ago, Satans said:

     Zenith is a beacon of light in the pure community 

    What.. Zenith literally does not want to drop mains to have a fullout with Fi (and I'm not even going to talk about the doxing threats and very worrisome comments regarding underaged children). I'll say it again: the 'pure' community sure has become shit and toxic in the last 8-9 years. Let's not put any effort in trying to make the 'pure' community pure(r) again, and point fingers!

  2. 5 hours ago, Moleman said:

    They rival with 3 other clans and cry when those clans decided to hit them with us. They have outside help(Rage+ly) and tons of themselves. They are only now pulling a 180 since their allies are weak and they cant hang in the current situation. 

    Even if both clans decide to drop the mains, the other clans would bring them and interferre, triggering more mains into the mix. I dont think you understand this rivarly at all. 

    They declared on us asking for 100v100 fullout, to counter the mains affecting the rivarly and end up not accepting it due to the main situation??


    They are just as bad, they knew what would happen if they started this rivarly.  (Both clans being in rivarlies with other clans)

     

    Yes, let's not put any effort in trying to make the 'pure' community pure(r) again, and point fingers! Fights between Fi and Z would become better if mains were dropped completely by both clans. And you know.. you could deal with crashers, like clans used to do in the past :)? And while the chances are slim that they would listen, but you know.. you could pm the ranks of the other clans and ask them to not intervene when you're fighting Fi (and as a result you could offer them something similar in return). Fi ranks could also do this. But hey, that's only if you want to try and have a fairer and more pure rivalry! Something tells me that's not in your interest lol.

  3. 1 hour ago, Broxxx said:

    Again you miss the point, you’re saying this will encourage clans to fight each other when in reality you’re not in touch with the community enough to suggest that. 
    Saying that monetary prizes, awards and bragging rights will make clans fight is incorrect - as recently as one month ago the longest standing pure clan (Fo) refused to fight the number one matched clan in F2P (Rage) in the Cotm decider when all three of these things were on the line.

    I know Foe declined, which was sad to see, but if people aren't willing to try and do their best to make the community better, then everybody might as well stop clanning if it's so horrible.

  4. 17 hours ago, Godfather said:

    tried suggesting it to slush, he seemed uninterested. basically gotta accept that the shitty system will remain. this is what we used in 2017 (most competitive year since 2011) when we did the 1-5 def movement, i piggybacked it off of IVP's top clan topic (now deleted) - could perhaps tweak it but these days i honestly don't care about this community.

     

    301fc0dd7f374bc3b3e763ab19379251.png.b37808135fbd2b58eb553a323ec6a63f.png

    Well done for putting this together. I do however feel we have to keep things simple for the majority and encourage clans to fight the clan above them, instead of avoiding. Clans can avoid and have preps outside of the system, but they wouldn't be rewarded or get to claim they're the #1 CW clan in F2P or P2P.
     

    16 hours ago, wars. said:

    hmmm not sure about this.

    Could you elaborate? 
     

    15 hours ago, Zalmon said:

    This has been tried multiple times, same as PCL. Doubt it will work this time

    It actually hasn't as far as I know, it has been suggested multiple times though, but in the end it's up to Sharkbrew to implement it.
     

    14 hours ago, BvG said:

    I've been gunning for the RAW system for years. It was fun as hell for CWA fullouts with ML lock back in the day, but realistically that won't be achievable anymore and would just be a headache for staff.

    This will probably be a headache for staff, too, but much less of one.

    I'd like to see it tried.

    This version would focus on matched clanwars preps, not fullouts. The WCOTM system could be kept, because promoting and rewarding midweek activity is good.
     

    13 hours ago, ubermensch said:

    RAW would be sick and a very nice change to the community.
     

    Of course there would need to be a way for clans to not only fight whomever is above them in ranking.

    The whole idea of the RAW system is to fight the clan 1 place above you, and to do so until you're #1. This makes the rankings very clear for F2P and P2P with regard to CW. It's the fairest method to decide who's #1. You have to keep performing to keep the #1 spot. If the #3 clan declares on #2, and #2 refuses to fight after X-amount of days, #3 will gain the #2 spot, after which they can declare on #1. But you have to work hard to earn the #1 spot, this creates a sense of accomplishment and competitiveness. If everybody could just declare on the #1 clan, there would be no way to decide the rankings (which is the whole idea of the system).
     

    12 hours ago, Doom kJ said:

    Woah Sandra is around, that is a blast from the past!!!

     

    Should stop by Zenith community and say hi to Hormone/Callum(Lol Spooned)/Eat Dark Bow/Rob(Blurred Pker)

    Hello! Say hi to them for me! I'm not sure I could contact them via discord.
     

    8 hours ago, Vanuckle said:

    Could using both work?

    No, since some clans would stick with the COTM system to avoid fighting certain clans. Afterwards you'd have people flame each other about who's the #1 clan during X-period. I believe the RAW system is the fairest method to rank all clans. The WCOTM system could be kept, since this RAW version would focus on CW (both F2P and P2P).
     

    6 hours ago, Fear The Beard said:

    RAW died a long time ago 

    It did, but that was because the community forums back then were replaced (I forgot all the names of the community websites, you had pure-warfare and another one before that), and the RAW system wasn't reused by the admins of the new community forums. It would be up to Sharkbrew to implement it. So if enough people and ranks want it...
     

    2 hours ago, Billy Costigan said:

    Wouldn't work in 2k20.


    Too many newfag avoider clans.

     

    /thread

    The whole point of this system is to reward clans for participating. If you don't participate, you won't get rewards and you won't be able to claim you're the #1 CW clan in F2P and/or P2P. Avoiding won't be rewarded, whereas you can still win COTM by avoiding. Avoiding shouldn't be rewarded in a competitive scene.
     

    58 minutes ago, catchat said:

    assuming pure clans play any part of this game competitively is a joke in itself. 

    They sure do during the weekend, during mini's, and during preps that now and then occur. It's just that clans that avoid can still win COTM, which is wrong in my opinion. Even if you dislike clan X.

  5. 15 minutes ago, Broxxx said:

    I'll prep who I want when I want, If you think clans are going to adhere to this system you're not in touch with this community in the slightest. 

    You are free to do so. Same goes for midweeks (for which a seperate system/list could be implemented). Under the RAW system it would just mean you'd get no rewards, and you wouldn't be able to claim #1 CW clan in F2P and/or P2P. I know the community isn't in the greatest shape, but that doesn't mean people should stop trying to improve it.

  6. 5 minutes ago, Brock Lesnar said:

    No, go back to pretending you don't play runescape anymore weirdo.

    Raw list is a failed system that's why it keeps dieing. @puppyslushCOTM system is much better fairer and gets clans constant action which encourages midweeks/. Thanks Slush.

    I have no clue why you hate me. I don't play runescape. 

    The RAW system hasn't even been implemented since the old forums closed as far as I know, so why do you say it keeps dying? I agree with you that the COTM system encourages midweeks, which is a good thing. Losing midweek activity would be bad. Perhaps a midweek list/system could be implemented besides the RAW list. 

  7. Dear Pure Community,

    Back in the old days of pure clanning there used to be a Ranks by Warring (RAW) list that was used to promote wilderness fullouts (in this case it could be used for 40 vs 40 CW preps). The way it worked was simple:

    1. All clans were placed on a numbered list for F2P, and a seperate one for P2P (#1 to #X depending on the amount of clans);
    2. Clans on the list could only declare on the clan right above them;
    3. If you beat the clan above you, your clan took their spot on the ranking list (rules were put in place to make sure you could not re-declare for X-amount of days);
    4. If a declaration was still ignored after X-amount of days, the clan that declared would take the spot of the clan that they declared upon;
    5. The list did not reset after X-amount of days, but I propose a reset if implemented (see poll).

    Besides two lists for CW (F2P and P2P), a seperate RAW list could be created for midweeks based on points.

    Some questions:

    • Would you, as a member or rank of a clan, like to see the RAW system replace the current COTM system to promote competitive preps (see the poll)?
    • If so, what kind of reward would you like to see, and when should the list reset (see the poll)?
    • What should be the minimum amount of opts for planned fights? I personally would set it at 40 vs 40 max or matched below it.
    • What fixed day(s) and times should be used for fights?
    • Would you like a seperate RAW list for midweeks?

    Feel free to discuss this idea further in the comments. Ranks are encouraged to chat with@slushpuppyand each other regarding such a potential system.

    Have a great day and stay safe!

  8. Welcome back! The pure community isn't what it used to be during the golden years of 2007-2011. Overall, people have become very immature and toxic, and its up to ranks and individuals to change that. Join some communities, and see which one is the most mature and makes you feel welcome. If none meet your standards, I would not advice you to force yourself to come back. I don't clan or play the game anymore, but still hang around now and then.

    Right now I would say that Foe is #1 in the wilderness, followed by Zenith (pull the most), Legacy, Rage, Fatality, and Apex. I have no clue with regard to CW - probably Apex and Foe.

  9. On 2/24/2020 at 3:50 PM, Hormone said:

    Got my Maga hat

     

    On 2/24/2020 at 4:23 PM, Trav said:

    Make them cry again #Trump2020

     

    On 2/24/2020 at 5:20 PM, Dynamic said:

    pog

     

    On 2/24/2020 at 5:20 PM, Warbow said:

    I approve!

     

    On 2/24/2020 at 5:39 PM, White Kid said:

    another 4 years of being red!

     

    On 2/24/2020 at 5:56 PM, Moni said:

     

     

    On 2/24/2020 at 9:01 PM, Godae said:

    Good update

     

    On 2/24/2020 at 10:56 PM, Kip said:

    TRUMP 2020

     

    On 2/25/2020 at 12:37 AM, Godfather said:

    vote republican, save your country.

    brexit or i disown my heritage.

    unmute me from sharkbrew

     

    On 2/25/2020 at 4:20 AM, Marko said:

    MAGA

     

    Lmfao

     

     

     

  10. Hello Spartan, hope you're doing well!

    The pure community isn't what it used to be anymore (you'll probably notice that from the replies your topic will get). 

    As for your F2P list. I wouldn't put Epidemic as #2, since we did not hold on to the #1 spot for long. Sure, it was impressive that we managed to get it so quickly, but clans like Eop and Fi (the former more so than the latter) have had a bigger impact on the F2P scene overall on the long term. I would also mention CP, who also had an impact on the pure community.

    Your P2P list definitely misses TLP!

×
×
  • Create New...