Jump to content

Sandra

Member
  • Posts

    387
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Good Banter
    Sandra got a reaction from UncleRash in [opinion] whose aftermath topic is the most convincing?   
    The fact that Zenith claims that they beat "130 Fatality + 80 Legacy + 50 Mains" with only 105 Zenith members makes me 🤔. I've seen some bad propaganda in my years..
  2. Good
    Sandra got a reaction from Fatality's Keeper in Fatality declines f2p fullout.   
    He literally says it's accepted if you drop the mains and outside help? The 'pure' community sure has become shit. This topic only makes you look bad, not Fi.
  3. Good
    Sandra reacted to Fake Smile in ZENITH PEDOPHILE RING FURTHER EXPOSED [AUTHORITIES NOTIFIED] [FBI APPROVED INFORMATION]   
    The age of consent is there for a reason. You are unable to make these decisions until generally you're 18. Even if you find the rare exceptions in practice, it is still risky to make more harm than pleasure.  Also, this type of thinking (of the user cited) is clearly of a person that is into criminal activity (Carpenter et al. 2014).
     
    Teenagers under the age of 18, especially girls, cannot know if they really want to engage into sexual relationships. Often feeling sorry for their decisions soon after. ,,Almost half of girls and one third of boys aged 16–17 years said that they had experienced some form of unwanted sexual behaviour towards them in the past 12 months." (Warren and Swami 2019).
     
     
    Carpenter, B., O’Brien, E., Hayes, S. and Death, J., 2014. Harm, Responsibility, Age, and Consent. New Criminal Law Review, 17 (1), 23-54.
    Warren, D. and Swami, N., 2019. Teenagers and sex. LSAC Annual Statistical Reports [online]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337670249_Teenagers_and_sex [Accessed 19 Sep 2020].
  4. Good
    Sandra got a reaction from Fatality's Keeper in Fatality declines f2p fullout.   
    He literally says it's accepted if you drop the mains and outside help? The 'pure' community sure has become shit. This topic only makes you look bad, not Fi.
  5. Good
    Sandra got a reaction from Fatality's Keeper in Fatality declines f2p fullout.   
    He literally says it's accepted if you drop the mains and outside help? The 'pure' community sure has become shit. This topic only makes you look bad, not Fi.
  6. Good
    Sandra got a reaction from Fatality's Keeper in Fatality declines f2p fullout.   
    He literally says it's accepted if you drop the mains and outside help? The 'pure' community sure has become shit. This topic only makes you look bad, not Fi.
  7. Good
    Sandra got a reaction from Fatality's Keeper in Fatality declines f2p fullout.   
    He literally says it's accepted if you drop the mains and outside help? The 'pure' community sure has become shit. This topic only makes you look bad, not Fi.
  8. Like
    Sandra reacted to Pug in Fatality declines f2p fullout.   
    The Era of good clanning was over in like 2009. 
     
    Clans won't team on crash due to "pride" , clans won't fight each other due to "rivaleries" which I find amusing. Clans just don't fight anymore and think Running @ each other touching tips for 10 seconds and teleporting out is fun. 
    The community is so easy to fix if ranks of clans would actually grow up. I just don't get how members of clans actually find it okay to be Lead under such a bad image.
  9. Like
    Sandra got a reaction from Pug in Fatality declines f2p fullout.   
    Yes, let's not put any effort in trying to make the 'pure' community pure(r) again, and point fingers! Fights between Fi and Z would become better if mains were dropped completely by both clans. And you know.. you could deal with crashers, like clans used to do in the past :)? And while the chances are slim that they would listen, but you know.. you could pm the ranks of the other clans and ask them to not intervene when you're fighting Fi (and as a result you could offer them something similar in return). Fi ranks could also do this. But hey, that's only if you want to try and have a fairer and more pure rivalry! Something tells me that's not in your interest lol.
  10. Good
    Sandra got a reaction from Fatality's Keeper in Fatality declines f2p fullout.   
    He literally says it's accepted if you drop the mains and outside help? The 'pure' community sure has become shit. This topic only makes you look bad, not Fi.
  11. Good
    Sandra got a reaction from Fatality's Keeper in Fatality declines f2p fullout.   
    He literally says it's accepted if you drop the mains and outside help? The 'pure' community sure has become shit. This topic only makes you look bad, not Fi.
  12. Good
    Sandra got a reaction from Fatality's Keeper in Fatality declines f2p fullout.   
    He literally says it's accepted if you drop the mains and outside help? The 'pure' community sure has become shit. This topic only makes you look bad, not Fi.
  13. Good
    Sandra got a reaction from Fatality's Keeper in Fatality declines f2p fullout.   
    He literally says it's accepted if you drop the mains and outside help? The 'pure' community sure has become shit. This topic only makes you look bad, not Fi.
  14. Good
    Sandra got a reaction from Fatality's Keeper in Fatality declines f2p fullout.   
    He literally says it's accepted if you drop the mains and outside help? The 'pure' community sure has become shit. This topic only makes you look bad, not Fi.
  15. Good
    Sandra got a reaction from Fatality's Keeper in Fatality declines f2p fullout.   
    He literally says it's accepted if you drop the mains and outside help? The 'pure' community sure has become shit. This topic only makes you look bad, not Fi.
  16. Good
    Sandra got a reaction from Fatality's Keeper in Fatality declines f2p fullout.   
    He literally says it's accepted if you drop the mains and outside help? The 'pure' community sure has become shit. This topic only makes you look bad, not Fi.
  17. Good
    Sandra got a reaction from Fatality's Keeper in Fatality declines f2p fullout.   
    He literally says it's accepted if you drop the mains and outside help? The 'pure' community sure has become shit. This topic only makes you look bad, not Fi.
  18. Thanks
    Sandra reacted to Albania in Good advice on handling your dog   
    Hey boys, so when i got my dog, it was very bad and it never listened to me, so i decided to follow a guide on Youtube and my dog Entangle has never been better! 

     

    Entangle is a doggie that sometimes pipes up, but as well as being an emotional dog, he is also a dog who needs to be taught who his real boss/owner is, and thats where the video comes in. 

     

    If you need any other advice on how to manage your dogs, just pm me on irc! @Albania in #cd-rs or #sharkbrew

     

    Enjoy the video, and get a notepad to write down key sentences. 

     



  19. Thanks
    Sandra reacted to Rob`Blurred in Documentary on Pure Clan History (Part 1)   
    and if you like it you'd be doing me a sweet ass favour if you upvote this:
     
     
  20. Good Banter
    Sandra reacted to Maaku in Ly fights clans downopts F2p saturday 8/22 pov   
    Oh its you again
  21. Like
    Sandra got a reaction from Thinkmax92 in An Active, Honourable Pure Clanning Scene [uLPC]   
    Dear Pure Community,
    At the end of 2014 and the start of 2015 the second wave of LPC clanning started with the help of IVP. More than 5 new clans were created to give the pure community a boost. Now, 4 years later, I propose the start of a new wave of pure clans and teams that will help increase the current pure community. However, this time around it will focus on ultra-low levelled pure clans (uLPC), capped at 30-45 combat and 1-3 defence and 1 pray. This new scene will focus on F2P and will be built on the old foundations of pure clanning. A foundation that started to rot before the introduction of EOC in 2012. In our current era this foundation has started to crumble, the walls have collapsed. I therefore propose the creation of a new scene, a pure clanning renaissance that focusses primarily on honour and purity.
    As most of you know W308 is filled with low levelled pures, ready to PK. It is in this light that I saw more opportunities. Opportunities to create a fun new scene based on pure action and old-fashioned fun. As most of you know the xLPC scene is brimmed with action, but there are many individuals within the 30-45 combat range that are looking for (multi) action. At the moment of writing there are a handful of clans and teams that PK on a daily basis within this combat range, and other than a lot of fun, this scene could bring a lot of new blood and action to the xLPC and LPC scene in the near future.
    What am I proposing?
    A new clanning scene for people, clans and teams who want to PK at a lower combat, primarily for Wilderness action and fun; A new clanning scene for clans and teams who can participate in weekly Pure Clan League (PCL) events on Friday in Clan Wars; A new clanning scene for clans and teams who want to participate in monthly fun events (red vs blue, fire strike wars, iron or bronze wars, snowball fights, rune 2h fights, and so on); The reintroduction of the Ranks by Warring (RAW) list in the pure community to stimulate full outs in F2P and P2P (in Clan Wars) with a clan that is 1 rank higher than you; A new clanning scene for people that hunger for a scene with more honour, based on the following rules that will be supported and respected by Sharkbrew:
      Crashing, losing and/or topics with fake-endings won’t be allowed on Sharkbrew. They will be removed; The last clan/team standing wins (this needs to be proven via video); Clans/teams that participate in this scene will be allowed to team upon crashing clans/teams for the duration of the fight; A clan/team that breaks the bracket rule (30-45 combat with 1-3 def and 1 pray) will be removed from Sharkbrew via the current dispute system (4/4 disputes and you’re out) and will be dealt with accordingly in-game (starving them from any action, and if needed: team-upon said clan/team) by all clans/teams who agreed upon the rules until such a clan/team adjusts back to the norm, in which case they will be allowed to post topics again on Sharkbrew; A clan/team that actively uses illegal activities (doxing, ddosing and hacking) will be removed from Sharkbrew after reliable evidence via a warning system (three strikes and you’re out); Clans/teams that participate in this scene won’t be allowed to teleport during fights vs other clans/teams in this scene. A clan/team that breaks this rule will be removed from Sharkbrew via the current dispute system (4/4 disputes and you’re out) and will be dealt with accordingly in-game (starving them from any action, and if needed: team-upon said clan/team) by all clans/teams who agreed upon the rules until such a clan/team adjusts back to the norm, in which case they will be allowed to post topics again on Sharkbrew. What can YOU do?
    I’m inviting anybody and everybody who wants to get involved in turning this proposal into a reality. If you’ve been thinking about creating a clan over the last few months (or ever, for that matter), now is the PERFECT time to do so. Gather some friends on IRC or discord and get the ball rolling! The goal of this new scene is to bring fun and honour back in the game at a lower level, but also to create a steady flow of new pure clanners who can end up in the xLPC and/or LPC scene.
    If you’re interested be sure to pm @Sandra and/or @slushpuppy on Sharkbrew. If enough people are interested a second topic will be created soon with clan/team names and their contact information.
     
    Currently there are two teams/clans ready to open, and there are 2 individuals who are interested and capable of creating a team for this scene! I'm looking for at least 2-4 more team-/clan-leaders who are willingly to create their own team or clan. There are already 3~ W308 teams in this combat range who are multi pking. PM me and/or @slushpuppy to inform us about your intentions.
     
    Thanks for reading!
  22. Like
    Sandra got a reaction from ewby in Replacing the COTM system with the RAW system?   
    Well done for putting this together. I do however feel we have to keep things simple for the majority and encourage clans to fight the clan above them, instead of avoiding. Clans can avoid and have preps outside of the system, but they wouldn't be rewarded or get to claim they're the #1 CW clan in F2P or P2P.
     
    Could you elaborate? 
     
    It actually hasn't as far as I know, it has been suggested multiple times though, but in the end it's up to Sharkbrew to implement it.
     
    This version would focus on matched clanwars preps, not fullouts. The WCOTM system could be kept, because promoting and rewarding midweek activity is good.
     
    The whole idea of the RAW system is to fight the clan 1 place above you, and to do so until you're #1. This makes the rankings very clear for F2P and P2P with regard to CW. It's the fairest method to decide who's #1. You have to keep performing to keep the #1 spot. If the #3 clan declares on #2, and #2 refuses to fight after X-amount of days, #3 will gain the #2 spot, after which they can declare on #1. But you have to work hard to earn the #1 spot, this creates a sense of accomplishment and competitiveness. If everybody could just declare on the #1 clan, there would be no way to decide the rankings (which is the whole idea of the system).
     
    Hello! Say hi to them for me! I'm not sure I could contact them via discord.
     
    No, since some clans would stick with the COTM system to avoid fighting certain clans. Afterwards you'd have people flame each other about who's the #1 clan during X-period. I believe the RAW system is the fairest method to rank all clans. The WCOTM system could be kept, since this RAW version would focus on CW (both F2P and P2P).
     
    It did, but that was because the community forums back then were replaced (I forgot all the names of the community websites, you had pure-warfare and another one before that), and the RAW system wasn't reused by the admins of the new community forums. It would be up to Sharkbrew to implement it. So if enough people and ranks want it...
     
    The whole point of this system is to reward clans for participating. If you don't participate, you won't get rewards and you won't be able to claim you're the #1 CW clan in F2P and/or P2P. Avoiding won't be rewarded, whereas you can still win COTM by avoiding. Avoiding shouldn't be rewarded in a competitive scene.
     
    They sure do during the weekend, during mini's, and during preps that now and then occur. It's just that clans that avoid can still win COTM, which is wrong in my opinion. Even if you dislike clan X.
  23. Like
    Sandra got a reaction from Trajan in Replacing the COTM system with the RAW system?   
    Dear Pure Community,

    Back in the old days of pure clanning there used to be a Ranks by Warring (RAW) list that was used to promote wilderness fullouts (in this case it could be used for 40 vs 40 CW preps). The way it worked was simple:
    All clans were placed on a numbered list for F2P, and a seperate one for P2P (#1 to #X depending on the amount of clans); Clans on the list could only declare on the clan right above them; If you beat the clan above you, your clan took their spot on the ranking list (rules were put in place to make sure you could not re-declare for X-amount of days); If a declaration was still ignored after X-amount of days, the clan that declared would take the spot of the clan that they declared upon; The list did not reset after X-amount of days, but I propose a reset if implemented (see poll). Besides two lists for CW (F2P and P2P), a seperate RAW list could be created for midweeks based on points.
    Some questions:
    Would you, as a member or rank of a clan, like to see the RAW system replace the current COTM system to promote competitive preps (see the poll)? If so, what kind of reward would you like to see, and when should the list reset (see the poll)? What should be the minimum amount of opts for planned fights? I personally would set it at 40 vs 40 max or matched below it. What fixed day(s) and times should be used for fights? Would you like a seperate RAW list for midweeks? Feel free to discuss this idea further in the comments. Ranks are encouraged to chat with@slushpuppyand each other regarding such a potential system.

    Have a great day and stay safe!
  24. Good
    Sandra reacted to Africa in ULPC Community   
    LAUNCH OF ULPC SCENE
    “Ultra Low Pure Clanning”
    After seeing the diminishing activity in the xLPC community, many had gathered to begin the ultimate initiative to gather all remaining souls to restart the wild. 
     
    I can proudly announce, along with my fellow chieftains Falcon and Rosters, and fellow clan leaders, we have placed all our effort into beginning the new Scene. Starting from the lowest of levels, we hope to attract as many people to joining the community to continue the day to day action on OSRS.

    As of current, we will be confirming the initial formation of uLPC Clans, many of which will be established by August 5, 2020.
    The first day of launch for the ULPC Scene will be Friday (Aug 7th), 4:30PM EST.
     
    We encourage everyone to join in on this new community and participate in the ongoing events that are to come.
    Join this ULPC Community discord: https://discord.gg/Mf6AbNE and bring forth your challenge, for all. 
    10+ clans have gathered thus far...
    Let the games begin!
     

  25. Poor Banter
    Sandra reacted to Brock Lesnar in ULPC Community   
    ultra super duper king kong level pure clan, cringe freaks train up do p2p and stop acting like fire strike runes loot is fun lmfaoooooooooo
×
×
  • Create New...