Official Duke

really biased...

Welcome to Sharkbrew Duke! It's Jay in the kik chat, I don't actually play Rs anymore i just lurk on this site seeing what everyones upto

Keep seeing retards from FS post the same pic and say most of the LPC scene is voting 75cb and theres no way it should go over 75 and preps should be kept at 75 cb cap.
 
80, 83, 88 and 92 are all BIGGER numbers than 75 and if you add up all of the votes higher than 75cb cap you get a total of 91 I think.
91>71 
 

 
Also why do FS keep saying they have f2p only accounts? 80% of the accounts on your memberlist are p2p based with 50 att+ so scared of p2p lel.

I personally think 80 CB Cap is the most fair option for everyone seeming some LPC's enjoy doing f2p.
Open to opinions on the CB cap but this vote clearly shows more people want a cb cap higher than 75.
@@Tannie l2math bro

Dude your vid is on a main
 
Why are you posting this on pures' aftermath section? I see at least 5 mains in your 11 man pull
 
pathetic

IV wins again hehehehe

 
I admire your optimism

why is tammie still obsessed with iv in general? no1 knows but everyones cringing still

@@Tannie I will personally join iv this winter break and close you by myself......

you should go outside more often

Why are you making topics about invictus when Doom is breaking your clan in half

Yes finally someone from IV agrees with me.

We should do 75 Cap, with Exceptions. There is always going to have members from each clan that goes broccolied and exceed the combat cap, we don't want to sit them every single prep. If it goes to 78cmb, there is going to be exception as well. We just have to fix the rules/amt of exceptions below 78/80.
 
 
You should actually tell your leaders/ranks about that. They did not even really discuss with the LPC scene itself then falsely claim they did. Only 2 clans that are increasing their CAP is IV+SF but seriously. SF doesn't even prep and has a whole bunch of 20def at LPC levels and (NO FLAME) IV sucks in clanwars based on results they have shown. Your leadership does not think logically about how their actions could affect LPC as a whole, Anyone could say 'lets just ignore them'. The truth is we cant. Action is Action. Starving clans of action is killing your own scene yourself. 
 
 
Thats what HPC multi' clanning is for.
 
 
thats for HPC multi clanning is for.
 
 
Thanks
 
 
Yeah. Not like we had a choice fighting down 30. You guys choose to hit us at 5. We just choose to pull down so your 80s couldnt hit us. Then you guys left and stopped returning. How is it wrong for us to claim a win? 
 
 
Omg Fly-By-Pker legend. @@`Fly

We will come back from this and put whatever happened here behind us.

Star wars: Rogue one nothing else 

LPC should remain at lower levels. If you want to use maxed accounts (50-60+atk), go and join an HPC. This is the same argument that arose last time there was an LPC scene and look what it achieved after people decided to max out their LPC accounts (mass mains/HPC invites on HPC accounts). 
 
Some cunts are unbelievable man, you start up a new scene because you want to refresh real pures from cancer and then start wanting the cancer back in the scenes via combat increases. Keep the scene fresh and organised, else it will fail as the scenes before all have. You've been given something promising and now you want to ruin it.

75 if clans want a higher cb cap make an mpc scene lmfao

poison = iv 
 
but we had to change the name cuz theres already an official clan called poison
good try though

Sounds good. but a mini tournament? 10v10? 75 cap, fs will always be down.

sounds like fun, could definitely set that up.

welcome

wait so, if they're the same levels at us, doesn't that take away from you're whole argument? lol

FS WHERE YOUR DAILY TOPICS ABOUT IV GO????
 
 

damn saucey lmfao
 
hacking, ddosing, ragging and 12345 sharkbrew topics won't save your brown sticky stuffty clan @@Lacson