Jump to content

puppyslush

Overseer
  • Posts

    2860
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    25

Posts posted by puppyslush

  1. Inspite of the lackluster response to the previous topic I made asking for name suggestions, we still need to solve this issue to aid in communications and publicity for this tournament especially when we start to repost activity topics on twitter. @Dox17came up with a few very good name suggestions for your consideration, please vote on them or suggest your own below

  2. the unpleasant truth is that when foe had to fight off rot at the beginning of i think... 19? or was it 20? FOE rivals basically helped rot destroy foe. color me surprised when rot eventually turned on those same clans demanding that they bend to rot''s hand. meanwhile rot rivals like rev/af aren't just gunna sit there and watch rot run from the main scene and feed off their allies.. rot had already frigging done that to CT before, so obv rev/af are going to interdict with rot's operation in the pure scene

    shoutout to clan for actually having the guts to tell rot to piss off(even initially) instead of simply bending over barebacked

  3. 3 hours ago, Vanuckle said:

    Any particular reason why the cap is at 50 max? Most of the clans in the main scene will have more than 50 v 50 with anything more than a 1-2 day prep in CWA these days.

    Oh just a feedback from a bunch of individuals.. if i am not wrong they were trying to draw a distinction between practice events vs serious ones. Would you like for me to increase it?

  4. 10 hours ago, Emperor Palpatine said:

    It would benefit Immortal, Nemesis, and a few other clans/teams that pull right around the 30 opt range. Consider lowering the minimum opt count for preps to anywhere from 27-30 for even further activity. 

     

    9 hours ago, Weak said:

    Sounds dope. Maybe 30v30 min would bring in some smaller teams? Think that would be best 

     

    9 hours ago, Fatal said:

    Could we adjust the minimum cap to 30 instead of 35?  Would broaden the potential for activity and make for more competition. If the "goal with this award is to encourage continuous CWA activity in the scene" then wouldn't that make the most sense?

     

    @puppyslush

    done guys, adjusted to 27v27

  5. (Still looking to improve the name-suggestions appreciated)

    The CWA activity in the main team scene had increased significantly as a result of the JCup rumors, we would like to encourage and bring more eyes to this brilliant movement with a monthly activity award. Please note that the goal with this award is to encourage continuous CWA activity in the scene- This is not an RSBL competitive award.

    What Are The Rules?

    Min opts for fights to be counted: 20v20

    3 points would be given both participants

    An additional 0.2 points to the winner

    For now there are no restrictions on the number of points you can earn in a day but we reserve the right to impose limitations if clans/teams start to abuse this system.

     

    Start date: We will start recording topics posted from the 25th of Apr onwards to count for month of may

    What Are The Prizes?

    90m RSGP

    A customized signature

    Forum award given to all members in your clan group https://www.sharkbrew.com/community/index.php?/clans/

     

    Who Can Participate?

    Any clan/team may participate(including pure clans who may have a main unit)

    How Do I Participate?

    Simply post your topic recap in https://www.sharkbrew.com/community/index.php?/forum/346-clan-warsrsbl/
    No further steps required

  6. 1 hour ago, Godfather said:

     

    if i were to make a suggestion to them for this problem it'd be to wait until a few months after the release of the clan system and ml lock based on a period of time in that clan.

    that's our intention eventually, our idea is to demonstrate to jagex that the clanning community has some mass and they should take us seriously

     

    1 hour ago, Godfather said:

    alternative suggestion: multiple opt brackets, such as 50v50, 75v75, 100v100. could cut down on the "need" of some clans to invite.

    that's definitely on the cards, we want to push the idea of multi category jcups like what we do here in our own community events incl xlpc

  7. 28 minutes ago, Godfather said:

     

    1. disputes over world/rules default to set format. defaults are world 333 (UK), map turrets, one round knock out.
    2. memberlists are to be presented ahead of time but the rsn does not have to be valid, meaning invites were still able to be brought in so long as they name changed before the event (why fatality "won" in 2014, despite having just as many invites as foe)
    3. memberlist lock was not abided by at all in 2016, probably due to jagex being sick of dealing with the pure community for 4 years in a row.
    4. this is more down to how poorly slapped together 2013 was, but literally anyone/everyone was invited into the 2013 jagex cup which is why MM's video was half-pure half-main.

     

    as long as we have a means of contacting jagex for this shit it should be ok but in the past the only contact we had with jagex was mod alfrd who didn't care much for the pure community after sv doxed him lmao

    i remember the memberlist issue but didn't care/know of the specifics... isn't it something really simple to do where u just simply dq rounds if there were invites. the whole thing sounds convoluted as fuck

  8. 25 minutes ago, Godfather said:

     

    1. disputes over world/rules default to set format. defaults are world 333 (UK), map turrets, one round knock out.
    2. memberlists are to be presented ahead of time but the rsn does not have to be valid, meaning invites were still able to be brought in so long as they name changed before the event (why fatality "won" in 2014, despite having just as many invites as foe)
    3. memberlist lock was not abided by at all in 2016, probably due to jagex being sick of dealing with the pure community for 4 years in a row.
    4. this is more down to how poorly slapped together 2013 was, but literally anyone/everyone was invited into the 2013 jagex cup which is why MM's video was half-pure half-main.

     

    as long as we have a means of contacting jagex for this shit it should be ok but in the past the only contact we had with jagex was mod alfrd who didn't care much for the pure community after sv doxed him lmao

    LMFAO

  9. image.png

    JCUP

    I believe the rumors about JCup stemmed from a livestream where Jmod Ayiza let known of the interest that Jagex was planning to run a JCup. Personally I wasn't too confident as Jagex had routinely let the clanning community down time after time and the fact that Ayiza just rejoined Jagex. However recent activity in the main CWA scene showed that many members are taking this seriously, thus I decided to ping Jagex Ash on twitter myself and I received a beautiful answer:

    In light of this confirmation from a senior developer in Jagex, We believe that many clans would probably want to conduct more CWA events to prepare for JCup

    Sharkbrew will be supporting your efforts by using our sponsorship money to fund more tournaments and activity-based CWA events so that even weaker clans can be rewarded for their contribution towards the overall activity in the CWA community.

    Stay tuned for more updates!

     

     

    DzFixGs.png

×
×
  • Create New...