Tyendinaga Posted October 12, 2017 Report Share Posted October 12, 2017 if you go back a page you'll see 17 comparing bringing mains to a cape switch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lil keef 2x Posted October 12, 2017 Report Share Posted October 12, 2017 eop shook! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auwi Posted October 12, 2017 Report Share Posted October 12, 2017 If signicant evidence rises that a prep was handed over to an 'ally' clan, its an automatic DQ for the entire month - due to attempting to cheat the system (which is in the new COTM revision). Attempting to cheat against a clan is another story though. Just like breaking a combat or defence cap, we need the victim clan to dispute - either at or after the prep (based on when the evidence is found).So let's say clan A is competing with clan B for cotm but then clan A preps clan C and breaks a rule that helps them win the prep but clan C doesn't dispute because they're allies with clan A so clan A ends up being ahead of clan B for cotm. How is that fair? Let's say clan A breaks the defence cap by bringing a lvl 126 main to fight against pures but clan C doesn't dispute, would clan A still get the points towards cotm? Interesting... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auwi Posted October 12, 2017 Report Share Posted October 12, 2017 the same ones who sandbag / leak first piles hmmmYou can't get caught leaking first piles but you can get caught bringing a cape switch to sabotage your clan. For example, the opposing clan will have video/pictures to prove who is cape switching duh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Albania Posted October 12, 2017 Report Share Posted October 12, 2017 Good people in Apex, take notes Foe whos the ugly girl in your pic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acid Posted October 12, 2017 Report Share Posted October 12, 2017 whos the ugly girl in your pic You're potato masher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lenin Posted October 13, 2017 Report Share Posted October 13, 2017 So let's say clan A is competing with clan B for cotm but then clan A preps clan C and breaks a rule that helps them win the prep but clan C doesn't dispute because they're allies with clan A so clan A ends up being ahead of clan B for cotm. How is that fair? Let's say clan A breaks the defence cap by bringing a lvl 126 main to fight against pures but clan C doesn't dispute, would clan A still get the points towards cotm? Interesting... If you could provide the evidence that this prep was thrown or a dispute was not done on purpose to allow a ally to win you are welcome to provide counter evidence for it which would DQ both of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auwi Posted October 13, 2017 Report Share Posted October 13, 2017 If you could provide the evidence that this prep was thrown or a dispute was not done on purpose to allow a ally to win you are welcome to provide counter evidence for it which would DQ both of them. seems like a terrible precedent to set. Why not void points for clans that break rules regardless if the other clan wants a redo or not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lenin Posted October 13, 2017 Report Share Posted October 13, 2017 seems like a terrible precedent to set. Why not void points for clans that break rules regardless if the other clan wants a redo or not? We cant ignore the decisions of clan ranks. You might like to win a DQ prep but others might not be willing. You have to respect that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auwi Posted October 13, 2017 Report Share Posted October 13, 2017 We cant ignore the decisions of clan ranks. You might like to win a DQ prep but others might not be willing. You have to respect that.Then at least honor the rules that other clans abide with by making the prep not count towards cotm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holiday Posted October 13, 2017 Report Share Posted October 13, 2017 Sounds like it's more about wondering why such a "superior legacy clan" like fo would be so unsettled by apex in f2p that they had to pull dirty tactics. yeah im sure they're terrified of his scim pushes at 16v16 with 0% run like he did vs cp l000l When was the last time EOP beat CP in a prep btw? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lenin Posted October 13, 2017 Report Share Posted October 13, 2017 Then at least honor the rules that other clans abide with by making the prep not count towards cotm Its not breaking the rules. Re-read the COTM base thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Law Abiding Citizen Posted October 13, 2017 Report Share Posted October 13, 2017 If you could provide the evidence that this prep was thrown or a dispute was not done on purpose to allow a ally to win you are welcome to provide counter evidence for it which would DQ both of them. Isn't waiting for something to go wrong rather than solving it a terrible precedent? Wouldn't you rather set a rule in stone so there's 0 tolerance for any rule breaking in future preps, regardless of a dispute asked for or not? You're just setting yourself and the sharkbrew staff up for major headaches and signs of further incompetence for future cases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auwi Posted October 13, 2017 Report Share Posted October 13, 2017 Its not breaking the rules. Re-read the COTM base thread.Breaking the rules regardless of whether or not the other clan disputes should still be acknowledged as breaking the rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lenin Posted October 13, 2017 Report Share Posted October 13, 2017 Isn't waiting for something to go wrong rather than solving it a terrible precedent? Wouldn't you rather set a rule in stone so there's 0 tolerance for any rule breaking in future preps, regardless of a dispute asked for or not? You're just setting yourself and the sharkbrew staff up for major headaches and signs of further incompetence for future cases. This is already going to be brought up when we revise the system entirely already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now