why wont fearless go to 80 cb cap?

[Jonathan]

Serious question, they're always in level 5 wild anyways not like they're going to be camped by level 100's

[Leen]

Probably because the LPC cap is 75

[Vito]

Probably because the LPC cap is 75

[Sir Phil]

Dumb question about to get alot of dumb answers.

[Tyendinaga]

 

 

Probably because the LPC cap is 75

cap should be AT MAX 78 - I thoroughly disagree with maxed out accounts in lpc to begin with and lpc has never been about p2p.

 

Fearless is right in keeping their cap at 75 despite Doom/IV saying otherwise. The higher you people go the worse the implications are for lpc.

[Leen]

cap should be AT MAX 78 - I thoroughly disagree with maxed out accounts in lpc to begin with and lpc has never been about p2p.

 

Fearless is right in keeping their cap at 75 despite Doom/IV saying otherwise. The higher you people go the worse the implications are for lpc.

Yup, the further away from HPC we remain, the better.

[Broxxx]

Because we aren't complete tomatos and know what happens to the scene and clans when the combat cap gets raised.

[Tribby]

80 Combat for lpcs is pretty dumb but I will say the lack of p2p in lpc is kind of beat but hey that's what how is for

[Colin]

Lol they'll train up eventually

[Maaku]

I go to fearless trips on my 39def

[Jernt]

The world may never know

[Hulk]

I'm personally up for a 78 combat cap. I think it's primarily because most of their members are maxed 40 attack or accounts without overs and have no need for a higher combat cap. Just a guess.

[Dobbs]

Lpc cap was 70 at one point

[Meet Them With Scims]

Probably because the LPC cap is 75

[Zig]

Because we aren't complete tomatos and know what happens to the scene and clans when the combat cap gets raised.

[Recep Ivedik]

Dunno

[Grabbin]

Idk tbh, I like a cap as low as possible tho, so 75 now.

Anything like 80 or so with everyone being maxed isn't quite "low"pure

[Luckz]

cap should be AT MAX 78 - I thoroughly disagree with maxed out accounts in lpc to begin with and lpc has never been about p2p.

 

Fearless is right in keeping their cap at 75 despite Doom/IV saying otherwise. The higher you people go the worse the implications are for lpc.

[IAmAGuyI]

Ok FI Jonathan

[Shadows]

Why should they?

[Purley]

 

cap should be AT MAX 78 - I thoroughly disagree with maxed out accounts in lpc to begin with and lpc has never been about p2p.

 

Fearless is right in keeping their cap at 75 despite Doom/IV saying otherwise. The higher you people go the worse the implications are for lpc.

This, people are constantly trying to raise the cap just move up if you want to be an mpc.

[Tannie]

Its ok to have exceptions but we're not gonna let clanwars event in-directly affecting wilderness event.

[Jez]

[Bizo]

78 seems fine being maxed 50 atk and 52 pray i believe and without mpc its not a problem

[zetro]

I'm personally up for a 78 combat cap. I think it's primarily because most of their members are maxed 40 attack or accounts without overs and have no need for a higher combat cap. Just a guess.

should be 78

Its ok to have exceptions but we're not gonna let clanwars event in-directly affecting wilderness event.

why not do 78 combat cap gives both clans action doom and fearless