If There Was a Fixed LPC Combat Cap;

[موني]

87 is realistic.

 

 

before when LPC clanning was actually prospering i'd say 70 lol. but theres no way to compete with 70- these days

[Trajan]

entire problem comes from the defence and prayer of HPC's. 

 

Considering that that ~mostly~ considered acceptable max for an HPC account is now 107, anything under I would say 95 combat is considered little. Bear in mind that 95 combat can be a maxed 1 def.  

 

a 50 attack maxes in 77 combats

 

a 60 attack maxes in 83 combats 

 

a 75 attack maxes in 88 combats 

 

None of these accounts are "LPC". They all have insane DPS for their combat levels and ironically, getting defense and prayer goes against the spirit of being pure. 

 

LPC's should be restricted to 75 combats. There will be some accounts with 99's but it will highly restrict mithril and prayer allowing more polished accounts to thrive while not being choked by the idea that pure clanning nowadays is all about getting over 100 combat (because it basically is).

Great points, but it'll never change.

[Yaz]

88 or 83

 

88 maxed 75 attack 52 pray

Or give up the 15 attack for 20 def

Or 60 attack 75 pray

 

 

All decent options

[Ham]

70-

[Xbites]

83 would be reasonable.

[Tripluh]

87

[James]

Shouldn't be capped, brown sticky stuffs a joke, people just bitch and complain about everything. "we only lost because you had 3 people over the x Combat level cap when we only agreed on 2!" You're clans just brown sticky stuff.

[Murd]

Shouldn't be capped, brown sticky stuffs a joke, people just bitch and complain about everything. "we only lost because you had 3 people over the x Combat level cap when we only agreed on 2!" You're clans just brown sticky stuff.

My view is it should be capped so then the banter about "breaking the combat cap/bringing more than the agreed amount of exceptions" can die out

[I_R0BUST_I]

40 cb-

[auwi]

20 def for an lpc only new kids would think about getting that. No one should have moth in an lpc Lpc should be 75 combat cap

Calm down bro, no one cares.

[Patrick]

My view is it should be capped so then the banter about "breaking the combat cap/bringing more than the agreed amount of exceptions" can die out

People train, restricting your members from playing/training on the game in order to stay below a certain Combat level is wrong The ultimate goal should be to move up and compete with the real clans instead of forcing your old members to train up new accounts once they've broken the cap or whatever. Its really just abusing the term LPC and pushing it to limits that it should not be pushed to :C

[Nicko]

69

[J-Swag]

LPC isn't really anything to do with low levels anymore, just garbage clans opened by leaders who know they can't compete with the proper clans so they've made their separate community to avoid getting squashed.

[Aquaxi]

im potato masher atm

[Palonation]

102

[Ash]

87

[Ir0ny]

I would say below 80 but below 83 would be realistic considering the current cancer in the LPC scene

[Corn_husker]

83

 

Maxed 60 atk pure

 

You retards don't do p2p anyway.

[Donny]

56

[Sage]

83 and under with defence of 1-10.

 

That's how it should be.

[Braden]

83 and under with defence of 1-10.

 

That's how it should be.

[Tubby]

90-

ty

[Watch My Shoes]

I mean realistically a low level pure is like 65- l0l, lpcs nowadays are weird man.

[Watch My Shoes]

I see lpc acc's higher leveled than some of these hpc acc's, trauma should have been a prime example for you all.

[Im__soBeast]

89-