Well done for putting this together. I do however feel we have to keep things simple for the majority and encourage clans to fight the clan above them, instead of avoiding. Clans can avoid and have preps outside of the system, but they wouldn't be rewarded or get to claim they're the #1 CW clan in F2P or P2P.
Could you elaborate?
It actually hasn't as far as I know, it has been suggested multiple times though, but in the end it's up to Sharkbrew to implement it.
This version would focus on matched clanwars preps, not fullouts. The WCOTM system could be kept, because promoting and rewarding midweek activity is good.
The whole idea of the RAW system is to fight the clan 1 place above you, and to do so until you're #1. This makes the rankings very clear for F2P and P2P with regard to CW. It's the fairest method to decide who's #1. You have to keep performing to keep the #1 spot. If the #3 clan declares on #2, and #2 refuses to fight after X-amount of days, #3 will gain the #2 spot, after which they can declare on #1. But you have to work hard to earn the #1 spot, this creates a sense of accomplishment and competitiveness. If everybody could just declare on the #1 clan, there would be no way to decide the rankings (which is the whole idea of the system).
Hello! Say hi to them for me! I'm not sure I could contact them via discord.
No, since some clans would stick with the COTM system to avoid fighting certain clans. Afterwards you'd have people flame each other about who's the #1 clan during X-period. I believe the RAW system is the fairest method to rank all clans. The WCOTM system could be kept, since this RAW version would focus on CW (both F2P and P2P).
It did, but that was because the community forums back then were replaced (I forgot all the names of the community websites, you had pure-warfare and another one before that), and the RAW system wasn't reused by the admins of the new community forums. It would be up to Sharkbrew to implement it. So if enough people and ranks want it...
The whole point of this system is to reward clans for participating. If you don't participate, you won't get rewards and you won't be able to claim you're the #1 CW clan in F2P and/or P2P. Avoiding won't be rewarded, whereas you can still win COTM by avoiding. Avoiding shouldn't be rewarded in a competitive scene.
They sure do during the weekend, during mini's, and during preps that now and then occur. It's just that clans that avoid can still win COTM, which is wrong in my opinion. Even if you dislike clan X.
It would be great to have a system like that back. Cotm has been pretty average at best, removed and replaced countless times due to its faults and also seems to reward clans starving eachother. Eg; nobody really p2p preps apex due to fear of loss, etc etc. Makes it quite simple and less risk to just prep average clans, farm wins etc.
This would be nice
You had more tanks than Foe, how delusional are you?
you can barely beat rage in f2p, so you clearly cannot beat foe matched opts let alone down 10
not to mention the fact that you hugged the single line west of 13 ports the entire fight until foe ran east to fight Rage where you chose to end your trip and claim some sort of cheap win for Sharkbrew clout, hopefully you keep the same energy tomorrow and stay to fight us for more than 5 seconds!!!
How am I biased when I sit and listening to your suggestions and everyone else's for COTM and declaration section. Aswell as all the brown sticky stuff disputes that clans put in and such but one warn that calls for it I'm biased.
You can't rank a clan that hasn't had an official weekend trip derp - it would be biased to have them listed anything higher without the proof/reasoning.
Murd in Replacing the COTM system with the RAW system?
ewby got a reaction from
ewby got a reaction from Mi Ni in [D]oom's F2P Sunday | 90+ Demons | Ft. Fearless , IV+ST, Terror
ewby got a reaction from Lord Ex in LPC Wilderness Rankings