Jump to content

Should Weekend Trips all be at the same time?


Tyendinaga
 Share

  

64 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Weekend trip times all be the same?

    • Yes, all HPC's, MPC's, and LPC's should have trips at the same time
      36
    • No, they should not
      28


Recommended Posts

 
Using combat levels to determine LPC, MPC, and HPC brackets is fucking dumb. nobody cares and combat levels are a gray area that sees itself extend into the 100's, pulls are the highest factor here and makes much more sense from a logical standpoint.
 
With the exception of HPC needless bickering is created by LPC and MPC leaders over what combat levels and exceptions are allowed as what levels you see on trips.  Frankly, considering the overall damage output provided doesn't change much between the combats of 83-108 and as a result you have maxed accounts in a supposed 'mpc' bracket when, if we're going to use the current definition, should never exceed 80ish combat but given the natural evolution of a clan's ml, everyone will inevitably gain levels. 

 

Considering the fact that the wilderness does the job of separating players by combat levels by itself, I see no reason why all pure clans should not go out at the same time. The more activity in the wilderness at the same time, the better. Multiclanning would effectively die(which is for the better) but would allow more fledgling clans a better idea of where they stand comparatively. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

single handedly the #1 and only reason why clans had these separate times is because there a dickheads in other clan leaderships who would take enjoyment and go way out of their way to come crash a 20v20 with 60+ ppl.

 

Literally only time clans like EoP Supremacy and RD get to throw down atm is when CP Fi and TLP are in a massive clusterfuck near mossies/corp entrance/gdz. MPC's don't do that brown sticky stuff, at least not AAO. Usuallly when clans do crash they end up as separate fights in close vicinity or get teamed on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No

 

When an hpc pulls lower they will hit lower tier clans (and crash) considering nobody accepts pkri requests anyways.

 

And gaps can be good.  If and when lpcs/mpcs move to hpcs they are introducing new blood into the hpc community which is what it needs more than anything. 

 

It's not a coincidence that ever since Zerg unit, supremacy, LT got into the hpc scene that it's thrived (even though 2 of the 3 are closed).  It once was 2-3 clans pulling 50 or less.  If you look at the hpc scene a year and a half ago you can see the correlation.

  

If Doom and CD go hpc, the next step would be for rage and slaughter to go mpc.  And then Olympus would go hpc followed by ruin etc etc (hopefully)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well HPC's and MPC's always went out together pre-eoc and it was still fine. It would be fine if people would nut up and stop worrying. Are you afraid of a bunch of 100s rushing a bunch of 70s at CA?

 

But sure having an LPC scene for extra low cbs is fair enough IMO, but MPC/HPC have next to no difference nowadays and should always be going out together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well HPC's and MPC's always went out together pre-eoc and it was still fine. It would be fine if people would nut up and stop worrying. Are you afraid of a bunch of 100s rushing a bunch of 70s at CA?

 

But sure having an LPC scene for extra low cbs is fair enough IMO, but MPC/HPC have next to no difference nowadays and should always be going out together.

this but too many people multiclan and dont want to pick just 1 to go to

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...