Jump to content

Sandra

Member
  • Posts

    387
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

2164 profile views

Sandra's Achievements

Advanced Member

Advanced Member (3/3)

79

Reputation

  1. The fact that Zenith claims that they beat "130 Fatality + 80 Legacy + 50 Mains" with only 105 Zenith members makes me . I've seen some bad propaganda in my years..
  2. Very understandable that Fi didn't want to fight mains at GDZ!
  3. What.. Zenith literally does not want to drop mains to have a fullout with Fi (and I'm not even going to talk about the doxing threats and very worrisome comments regarding underaged children). I'll say it again: the 'pure' community sure has become shit and toxic in the last 8-9 years. Let's not put any effort in trying to make the 'pure' community pure(r) again, and point fingers!
  4. Yes, let's not put any effort in trying to make the 'pure' community pure(r) again, and point fingers! Fights between Fi and Z would become better if mains were dropped completely by both clans. And you know.. you could deal with crashers, like clans used to do in the past :)? And while the chances are slim that they would listen, but you know.. you could pm the ranks of the other clans and ask them to not intervene when you're fighting Fi (and as a result you could offer them something similar in return). Fi ranks could also do this. But hey, that's only if you want to try and have a fairer and more pure rivalry! Something tells me that's not in your interest lol.
  5. He literally says it's accepted if you drop the mains and outside help? The 'pure' community sure has become shit. This topic only makes you look bad, not Fi.
  6. The clan who can muster the most pures and mains consistently (both internally and externally). In a fair 1 vs 1 rivalry without mains and outside help? Fatality. Since this clearly isn't the case it's hard to say. Zenith surely have the numbers, but Fatality seem to have more quality for now.
  7. Was good to watch! Bringing back a lot of memories!
  8. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAh9NRGNhUU Focus Maaku
  9. I know Foe declined, which was sad to see, but if people aren't willing to try and do their best to make the community better, then everybody might as well stop clanning if it's so horrible.
  10. So you don't care about the reward or being able to claim #1 CW clan in F2P and/or P2P? What would make you care?
  11. Well done for putting this together. I do however feel we have to keep things simple for the majority and encourage clans to fight the clan above them, instead of avoiding. Clans can avoid and have preps outside of the system, but they wouldn't be rewarded or get to claim they're the #1 CW clan in F2P or P2P. Could you elaborate? It actually hasn't as far as I know, it has been suggested multiple times though, but in the end it's up to Sharkbrew to implement it. This version would focus on matched clanwars preps, not fullouts. The WCOTM system could be kept, because promoting and rewarding midweek activity is good. The whole idea of the RAW system is to fight the clan 1 place above you, and to do so until you're #1. This makes the rankings very clear for F2P and P2P with regard to CW. It's the fairest method to decide who's #1. You have to keep performing to keep the #1 spot. If the #3 clan declares on #2, and #2 refuses to fight after X-amount of days, #3 will gain the #2 spot, after which they can declare on #1. But you have to work hard to earn the #1 spot, this creates a sense of accomplishment and competitiveness. If everybody could just declare on the #1 clan, there would be no way to decide the rankings (which is the whole idea of the system). Hello! Say hi to them for me! I'm not sure I could contact them via discord. No, since some clans would stick with the COTM system to avoid fighting certain clans. Afterwards you'd have people flame each other about who's the #1 clan during X-period. I believe the RAW system is the fairest method to rank all clans. The WCOTM system could be kept, since this RAW version would focus on CW (both F2P and P2P). It did, but that was because the community forums back then were replaced (I forgot all the names of the community websites, you had pure-warfare and another one before that), and the RAW system wasn't reused by the admins of the new community forums. It would be up to Sharkbrew to implement it. So if enough people and ranks want it... The whole point of this system is to reward clans for participating. If you don't participate, you won't get rewards and you won't be able to claim you're the #1 CW clan in F2P and/or P2P. Avoiding won't be rewarded, whereas you can still win COTM by avoiding. Avoiding shouldn't be rewarded in a competitive scene. They sure do during the weekend, during mini's, and during preps that now and then occur. It's just that clans that avoid can still win COTM, which is wrong in my opinion. Even if you dislike clan X.
  12. You are free to do so. Same goes for midweeks (for which a seperate system/list could be implemented). Under the RAW system it would just mean you'd get no rewards, and you wouldn't be able to claim #1 CW clan in F2P and/or P2P. I know the community isn't in the greatest shape, but that doesn't mean people should stop trying to improve it.
  13. I have no clue why you hate me. I don't play runescape. The RAW system hasn't even been implemented since the old forums closed as far as I know, so why do you say it keeps dying? I agree with you that the COTM system encourages midweeks, which is a good thing. Losing midweek activity would be bad. Perhaps a midweek list/system could be implemented besides the RAW list.
  14. Dear Pure Community, Back in the old days of pure clanning there used to be a Ranks by Warring (RAW) list that was used to promote wilderness fullouts (in this case it could be used for 40 vs 40 CW preps). The way it worked was simple: All clans were placed on a numbered list for F2P, and a seperate one for P2P (#1 to #X depending on the amount of clans); Clans on the list could only declare on the clan right above them; If you beat the clan above you, your clan took their spot on the ranking list (rules were put in place to make sure you could not re-declare for X-amount of days); If a declaration was still ignored after X-amount of days, the clan that declared would take the spot of the clan that they declared upon; The list did not reset after X-amount of days, but I propose a reset if implemented (see poll). Besides two lists for CW (F2P and P2P), a seperate RAW list could be created for midweeks based on points. Some questions: Would you, as a member or rank of a clan, like to see the RAW system replace the current COTM system to promote competitive preps (see the poll)? If so, what kind of reward would you like to see, and when should the list reset (see the poll)? What should be the minimum amount of opts for planned fights? I personally would set it at 40 vs 40 max or matched below it. What fixed day(s) and times should be used for fights? Would you like a seperate RAW list for midweeks? Feel free to discuss this idea further in the comments. Ranks are encouraged to chat with@slushpuppyand each other regarding such a potential system. Have a great day and stay safe!
×
×
  • Create New...