clan wars/verfied FO bends the knee to the true P2P kings

[nICK1]

damn grat eop yep very well done

 

still undefeated in all p2p preps and only lost 1 f2p prep since re-joining the boys wow feel rly good man

[holydreams]

@@slushpuppy

 

[15:56] <14slushpuppy> <slushpuppy> so now leaving is acceptable reason for nulling a round

[15:56] <14slushpuppy> <slushpuppy> i find it quite hard to null a round based on leaving..

[15:56] <14slushpuppy> those r my issues

 

Ever since I have been around the pure clanning scene, there has always been the common agreement that in order for a clan to "win" a prep, there must be the legitimate completion of the prep, with the victor clan having 2 victorious rounds in a best of 3 WITH battle.

 

There have also always been cases where clans have left the portal PRIOR to the fight beginning in the respective round, asking for a simple rechallenge that is expected to be given. There has NEVER been the consistent notion of clans earning "free" round wins if a clan leaves the arena to ask for a simple rechallenge to actually fight it out. In the case of scummy clans who wish to gain every little advantage they can without fighting, they will most likely more than not try to find reasons not to cooperate and win without fighting, and so that is the small case where it exists.

 

In the case of the Foe vs Eop prep today, the first two rounds saw battle from both sides. Before the 3rd round, the score was tied at 1-1 and we were ready to see who would win the prep in the final round. Both sides were at a disadvantage for the first two rounds, but we continued nevertheless. We entered the arena, Eop walked to their portal to defend while we waited in the centre. Now, BEFORE the fight began, we left the portal to get a rechallenge which in the history of pure clanning has NEVER been a problem. Eop obviously didn't care so they decided it would be time for them to claim a 2-1 victory and walk away. We sat there waiting for 10 minutes for them to ACTUALLY FIGHT US, spamming "Challenge". They didn't want to complete the prep so they left.

 

Now, my argument is that the prep is classified as unfinished because there was NEVER a battle to decide a victor for the 3rd round. 

 

Now, onto your concerns. Nulling the round because we left is not the entire argument. There was never a battle which ensued to crown a victor, and so us leaving the portal before the fight began is not a valid representation of a forfeit because it was not an act of preventing the entire battle from taking place. We stayed there waiting for that final battle which they didn't want. They took the easy way out, trying to in fact cheat the system, victory without actually winning.

 

Now, historically, it has never been a problem to ask for a rechallenge BECAUSE both sides know that the prep is unfinished until there is one clan that has two clear round wins WITH battle. That did not occur today, and that's why this specific prep should be nulled.

 

They could have simply accepted to fight in a legitimate R3 battle and finish the prep, but they chose not to. Therefore, the fate of the prep finishing was in their hands and they decided to walk away with a WIN without actually earning the victory and finishing the prep. Seems like a flawed system to me if you award them the win.

 

The majority of clans do not prep with the idea of trying to cheat the system at all times, except for the ones THAT walk away from an unfinished prep. In any case, if clans start continuously leaving like you mentioned to me, then maybe set a rule that you are unable to leave more than once per round of the prep?

[Knox]

so lemme get this str8 the "kings of p2p" were not willing to match eop a f2p based clan?

 

lmfao

[Palidino]

 

@@slushpuppy

 

[15:56] <14slushpuppy> <slushpuppy> so now leaving is acceptable reason for nulling a round

[15:56] <14slushpuppy> <slushpuppy> i find it quite hard to null a round based on leaving..

[15:56] <14slushpuppy> those r my issues

 

Ever since I have been around the pure clanning scene, there has always been the common agreement that in order for a clan to "win" a prep, there must be the legitimate completion of the prep, with the victor clan having 2 victorious rounds in a best of 3 WITH battle.

 

There have also always been cases where clans have left the portal PRIOR to the fight beginning in the respective round, asking for a simple rechallenge that is expected to be given. There has NEVER been the consistent notion of clans earning "free" round wins if a clan leaves the arena to ask for a simple rechallenge to actually fight it out. In the case of scummy clans who wish to gain every little advantage they can without fighting, they will most likely more than not try to find reasons not to cooperate and win without fighting, and so that is the small case where it exists.

 

In the case of the Foe vs Eop prep today, the first two rounds saw battle from both sides. Before the 3rd round, the score was tied at 1-1 and we were ready to see who would win the prep in the final round. Both sides were at a disadvantage for the first two rounds, but we continued nevertheless. We entered the arena, Eop walked to their portal to defend while we waited in the centre. Now, BEFORE the fight began, we left the portal to get a rechallenge which in the history of pure clanning has NEVER been a problem. Eop obviously didn't care so they decided it would be time for them to claim a 2-1 victory and walk away. We sat there waiting for 10 minutes for them to ACTUALLY FIGHT US, spamming "Challenge". They didn't want to complete the prep so they left.

 

Now, my argument is that the prep is classified as unfinished because there was NEVER a battle to decide a victor for the 3rd round. 

 

Now, onto your concerns. Nulling the round because we left is not the entire argument. There was never a battle which ensued to crown a victor, and so us leaving the portal before the fight began is not a valid representation of a forfeit because it was not an act of preventing the entire battle from taking place. We stayed there waiting for that final battle which they didn't want. They took the easy way out, trying to in fact cheat the system, victory without actually winning.

 

Now, historically, it has never been a problem to ask for a rechallenge BECAUSE both sides know that the prep is unfinished until there is one clan that has two clear round wins WITH battle. That did not occur today, and that's why this specific prep should be nulled.

 

They could have simply accepted to fight in a legitimate R3 battle and finish the prep, but they chose not too. Therefore, the fate of the prep finishing was in their hands and they decided to walk away with a WIN without actually earning the victory and finishing the prep. Seems like a flawed system to me if you award them the win.

 

The majority of clans do not prep with the idea of trying to cheat the system at all times, except for the ones THAT walk away from an unfinished prep.

 

[DULL]

 

@@slushpuppy

 

[15:56] <14slushpuppy> <slushpuppy> so now leaving is acceptable reason for nulling a round

[15:56] <14slushpuppy> <slushpuppy> i find it quite hard to null a round based on leaving..

[15:56] <14slushpuppy> those r my issues

 

Ever since I have been around the pure clanning scene, there has always been the common agreement that in order for a clan to "win" a prep, there must be the legitimate completion of the prep, with the victor clan having 2 victorious rounds in a best of 3 WITH battle.

 

There have also always been cases where clans have left the portal PRIOR to the fight beginning in the respective round, asking for a simple rechallenge that is expected to be given. There has NEVER been the consistent notion of clans earning "free" round wins if a clan leaves the arena to ask for a simple rechallenge to actually fight it out. In the case of scummy clans who wish to gain every little advantage they can without fighting, they will most likely more than not try to find reasons not to cooperate and win without fighting, and so that is the small case where it exists.

 

In the case of the Foe vs Eop prep today, the first two rounds saw battle from both sides. Before the 3rd round, the score was tied at 1-1 and we were ready to see who would win the prep in the final round. Both sides were at a disadvantage for the first two rounds, but we continued nevertheless. We entered the arena, Eop walked to their portal to defend while we waited in the centre. Now, BEFORE the fight began, we left the portal to get a rechallenge which in the history of pure clanning has NEVER been a problem. Eop obviously didn't care so they decided it would be time for them to claim a 2-1 victory and walk away. We sat there waiting for 10 minutes for them to ACTUALLY FIGHT US, spamming "Challenge". They didn't want to complete the prep so they left.

 

Now, my argument is that the prep is classified as unfinished because there was NEVER a battle to decide a victor for the 3rd round. 

 

Now, onto your concerns. Nulling the round because we left is not the entire argument. There was never a battle which ensued to crown a victor, and so us leaving the portal before the fight began is not a valid representation of a forfeit because it was not an act of preventing the entire battle from taking place. We stayed there waiting for that final battle which they didn't want. They took the easy way out, trying to in fact cheat the system, victory without actually winning.

 

Now, historically, it has never been a problem to ask for a rechallenge BECAUSE both sides know that the prep is unfinished until there is one clan that has two clear round wins WITH battle. That did not occur today, and that's why this specific prep should be nulled.

 

They could have simply accepted to fight in a legitimate R3 battle and finish the prep, but they chose not too. Therefore, the fate of the prep finishing was in their hands and they decided to walk away with a WIN without actually earning the victory and finishing the prep. Seems like a flawed system to me if you award them the win.

 

The majority of clans do not prep with the idea of trying to cheat the system at all times, except for the ones THAT walk away from an unfinished prep.

 

hey man you lost ty 4 win and move along buddy you can't just leave a prep cause u sat 2 ppl lmao

[Runefury]

I see where foe is coming from but you can't just expect a redo after declining a redo.

[nICK1]

can it be added now? thank gz eop

[Togo]

can it be added now? thank gz eop

Grats EoP

 

Grats nick

[2 ponytails irl]

holy brown sticky stuff fo are actually dead

[Cronic]

Wow lol

This matters

[JoJo]

Hmm after reading all the comments it definitely seems as though eop winner yep. Eop r some big ownage lmao fo r big suck clan. 

[E0P Chaldean]

wahaha my clan winner!

 

rip fo you tried!

[TLP FLAME UNIT]

 

@@slushpuppy

 

[15:56] <14slushpuppy> <slushpuppy> so now leaving is acceptable reason for nulling a round

[15:56] <14slushpuppy> <slushpuppy> i find it quite hard to null a round based on leaving..

[15:56] <14slushpuppy> those r my issues

 

Ever since I have been around the pure clanning scene, there has always been the common agreement that in order for a clan to "win" a prep, there must be the legitimate completion of the prep, with the victor clan having 2 victorious rounds in a best of 3 WITH battle.

 

There have also always been cases where clans have left the portal PRIOR to the fight beginning in the respective round, asking for a simple rechallenge that is expected to be given. There has NEVER been the consistent notion of clans earning "free" round wins if a clan leaves the arena to ask for a simple rechallenge to actually fight it out. In the case of scummy clans who wish to gain every little advantage they can without fighting, they will most likely more than not try to find reasons not to cooperate and win without fighting, and so that is the small case where it exists.

 

In the case of the Foe vs Eop prep today, the first two rounds saw battle from both sides. Before the 3rd round, the score was tied at 1-1 and we were ready to see who would win the prep in the final round. Both sides were at a disadvantage for the first two rounds, but we continued nevertheless. We entered the arena, Eop walked to their portal to defend while we waited in the centre. Now, BEFORE the fight began, we left the portal to get a rechallenge which in the history of pure clanning has NEVER been a problem. Eop obviously didn't care so they decided it would be time for them to claim a 2-1 victory and walk away. We sat there waiting for 10 minutes for them to ACTUALLY FIGHT US, spamming "Challenge". They didn't want to complete the prep so they left.

 

Now, my argument is that the prep is classified as unfinished because there was NEVER a battle to decide a victor for the 3rd round. 

 

Now, onto your concerns. Nulling the round because we left is not the entire argument. There was never a battle which ensued to crown a victor, and so us leaving the portal before the fight began is not a valid representation of a forfeit because it was not an act of preventing the entire battle from taking place. We stayed there waiting for that final battle which they didn't want. They took the easy way out, trying to in fact cheat the system, victory without actually winning.

 

Now, historically, it has never been a problem to ask for a rechallenge BECAUSE both sides know that the prep is unfinished until there is one clan that has two clear round wins WITH battle. That did not occur today, and that's why this specific prep should be nulled.

 

They could have simply accepted to fight in a legitimate R3 battle and finish the prep, but they chose not to. Therefore, the fate of the prep finishing was in their hands and they decided to walk away with a WIN without actually earning the victory and finishing the prep. Seems like a flawed system to me if you award them the win.

 

The majority of clans do not prep with the idea of trying to cheat the system at all times, except for the ones THAT walk away from an unfinished prep. In any case, if clans start continuously leaving like you mentioned to me, then maybe set a rule that you are unable to leave more than once per round of the prep?

 

[coc is roc]

 

@@slushpuppy

 

[15:56] <14slushpuppy> <slushpuppy> so now leaving is acceptable reason for nulling a round

[15:56] <14slushpuppy> <slushpuppy> i find it quite hard to null a round based on leaving..

[15:56] <14slushpuppy> those r my issues

 

Ever since I have been around the pure clanning scene, there has always been the common agreement that in order for a clan to "win" a prep, there must be the legitimate completion of the prep, with the victor clan having 2 victorious rounds in a best of 3 WITH battle.

 

There have also always been cases where clans have left the portal PRIOR to the fight beginning in the respective round, asking for a simple rechallenge that is expected to be given. There has NEVER been the consistent notion of clans earning "free" round wins if a clan leaves the arena to ask for a simple rechallenge to actually fight it out. In the case of scummy clans who wish to gain every little advantage they can without fighting, they will most likely more than not try to find reasons not to cooperate and win without fighting, and so that is the small case where it exists.

 

In the case of the Foe vs Eop prep today, the first two rounds saw battle from both sides. Before the 3rd round, the score was tied at 1-1 and we were ready to see who would win the prep in the final round. Both sides were at a disadvantage for the first two rounds, but we continued nevertheless. We entered the arena, Eop walked to their portal to defend while we waited in the centre. Now, BEFORE the fight began, we left the portal to get a rechallenge which in the history of pure clanning has NEVER been a problem. Eop obviously didn't care so they decided it would be time for them to claim a 2-1 victory and walk away. We sat there waiting for 10 minutes for them to ACTUALLY FIGHT US, spamming "Challenge". They didn't want to complete the prep so they left.

 

Now, my argument is that the prep is classified as unfinished because there was NEVER a battle to decide a victor for the 3rd round. 

 

Now, onto your concerns. Nulling the round because we left is not the entire argument. There was never a battle which ensued to crown a victor, and so us leaving the portal before the fight began is not a valid representation of a forfeit because it was not an act of preventing the entire battle from taking place. We stayed there waiting for that final battle which they didn't want. They took the easy way out, trying to in fact cheat the system, victory without actually winning.

 

Now, historically, it has never been a problem to ask for a rechallenge BECAUSE both sides know that the prep is unfinished until there is one clan that has two clear round wins WITH battle. That did not occur today, and that's why this specific prep should be nulled.

 

They could have simply accepted to fight in a legitimate R3 battle and finish the prep, but they chose not to. Therefore, the fate of the prep finishing was in their hands and they decided to walk away with a WIN without actually earning the victory and finishing the prep. Seems like a flawed system to me if you award them the win.

 

The majority of clans do not prep with the idea of trying to cheat the system at all times, except for the ones THAT walk away from an unfinished prep. In any case, if clans start continuously leaving like you mentioned to me, then maybe set a rule that you are unable to leave more than once per round of the prep?

 

nice essay broccoli lmfao u care so fuckin much about a sharkbrew win 

[Sharkbrew Legend]

holy fuk fo care way 2 much about losing on this game lo000l

 

thankfully we have a prep vs eop soon where no matter the result, both clans will be happy that they at least got some action!!

[E0P Chaldean]

holy fuk fo care way 2 much about losing on this game lo000l

 

thankfully we have a prep vs eop soon where no matter the result, both clans will be happy that they at least got some action!!

 

Can we give this man a round of applause.

[Sybren]

Can we give this man a round of applause.

True that

 

Gratz EoP, GF FOE.

[coc is roc]

oww my cwa loss 

[Winnetou]

 

@@slushpuppy

 

[15:56] <14slushpuppy> <slushpuppy> so now leaving is acceptable reason for nulling a round

[15:56] <14slushpuppy> <slushpuppy> i find it quite hard to null a round based on leaving..

[15:56] <14slushpuppy> those r my issues

 

Ever since I have been around the pure clanning scene, there has always been the common agreement that in order for a clan to "win" a prep, there must be the legitimate completion of the prep, with the victor clan having 2 victorious rounds in a best of 3 WITH battle.

 

There have also always been cases where clans have left the portal PRIOR to the fight beginning in the respective round, asking for a simple rechallenge that is expected to be given. There has NEVER been the consistent notion of clans earning "free" round wins if a clan leaves the arena to ask for a simple rechallenge to actually fight it out. In the case of scummy clans who wish to gain every little advantage they can without fighting, they will most likely more than not try to find reasons not to cooperate and win without fighting, and so that is the small case where it exists.

 

In the case of the Foe vs Eop prep today, the first two rounds saw battle from both sides. Before the 3rd round, the score was tied at 1-1 and we were ready to see who would win the prep in the final round. Both sides were at a disadvantage for the first two rounds, but we continued nevertheless. We entered the arena, Eop walked to their portal to defend while we waited in the centre. Now, BEFORE the fight began, we left the portal to get a rechallenge which in the history of pure clanning has NEVER been a problem. Eop obviously didn't care so they decided it would be time for them to claim a 2-1 victory and walk away. We sat there waiting for 10 minutes for them to ACTUALLY FIGHT US, spamming "Challenge". They didn't want to complete the prep so they left.

 

Now, my argument is that the prep is classified as unfinished because there was NEVER a battle to decide a victor for the 3rd round. 

 

Now, onto your concerns. Nulling the round because we left is not the entire argument. There was never a battle which ensued to crown a victor, and so us leaving the portal before the fight began is not a valid representation of a forfeit because it was not an act of preventing the entire battle from taking place. We stayed there waiting for that final battle which they didn't want. They took the easy way out, trying to in fact cheat the system, victory without actually winning.

 

Now, historically, it has never been a problem to ask for a rechallenge BECAUSE both sides know that the prep is unfinished until there is one clan that has two clear round wins WITH battle. That did not occur today, and that's why this specific prep should be nulled.

 

They could have simply accepted to fight in a legitimate R3 battle and finish the prep, but they chose not to. Therefore, the fate of the prep finishing was in their hands and they decided to walk away with a WIN without actually earning the victory and finishing the prep. Seems like a flawed system to me if you award them the win.

 

The majority of clans do not prep with the idea of trying to cheat the system at all times, except for the ones THAT walk away from an unfinished prep. In any case, if clans start continuously leaving like you mentioned to me, then maybe set a rule that you are unable to leave more than once per round of the prep?

 

stfu you only won round 1 cause you rushed +4 and we werent ready (not potted/not praying)

 

we could have left the cc and claim ddos too

 

tryhards waste my time

[sudo_]

I don't understand why they need to leave the cc simply because they were down one? We were down four the first round and didn't leave at all. It really does say a lot about how confident they are in their members when they back down at the first sign of difficulty.

[Range Grudge]

   

[Control Pker]

gz you won 1 prep out of a 120+ win streak gl. 

True that

 

Gratz EoP, GF FOE.

your more active on sharkbrew then leading your pk trips. 

You know we have you by your balls kid. #pandemic

[Hazardous]

If i want to read a book, i'll ask @@HolyDreams

[YOOITZKID]

Heard you had mains inside and ddosed 5 of their members rofl

[0verl0wd]

Sharkbrew Drama

I'd call it a tie